국내에서 유통 중인 축산환경개선제의 표기사항 및 항생제 내성 현황조사 (An Investigation on the Anitibiotic Resistant Condition and Label-Stated of Domestically Distributed Livestock-Environment Improving Agents)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국미생물·생명공학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국미생물·생명공학회지 / 37권 / 3호 / 258 ~ 265페이지
· 저자명 : 최정은, 이은영

초록

A study on livestock environment improving agents was conducted; top two brands (A and B) in the market, bottom two brands (E and F) based
on market shares and two newly developed agents (C and D) were measured for viable count and tested for resistance towards antibiotics prohibited against livestock feeds. Test results revealed that the measured viable
count of agents A and B matched those on the labels were identical; however agent E lacked information on viable counts nor the intended usage, while the measured viable count of agent F was less than the label-stated
count. No correlation was found between the antibiotic-resistance test and market share, and most of the agents excluding B were found to display resistance case of Lincosimides such as Lincomycine and Clindmycin,
resistant bacteria were found, with the except of agent B. Amoxicillin, Ampicillin and Penillin (type-Penecillins) and Erythromycin (type-Macrolide) were shown to contain resistant bacteria, with the except of
agents B and E; the same for Norploxacin (type-Quinoline) and Neomycin antibiotics. Aminoglycosides such as Gentamycin and Streptomycin contained resistant bacteria, excluding agent B. Oxytetracyclin (type-Tetracycline),
which is banned for use as resistant bacteria showed the highest sensitivity among the 12 antibiotics,revealed positive results in the test for resistant bacteria; again excluding of agents B and E. These results
reveal that many agents contained resistant bacteria despite the fact that they were prohibited; this calls for a more accurate display of the facts and specifications, systematic distributions and strict verification processes
of environment improving agents.

영어초록

A study on livestock environment improving agents was conducted; top two brands (A and B) in the market, bottom two brands (E and F) based
on market shares and two newly developed agents (C and D) were measured for viable count and tested for resistance towards antibiotics prohibited against livestock feeds. Test results revealed that the measured viable
count of agents A and B matched those on the labels were identical; however agent E lacked information on viable counts nor the intended usage, while the measured viable count of agent F was less than the label-stated
count. No correlation was found between the antibiotic-resistance test and market share, and most of the agents excluding B were found to display resistance case of Lincosimides such as Lincomycine and Clindmycin,
resistant bacteria were found, with the except of agent B. Amoxicillin, Ampicillin and Penillin (type-Penecillins) and Erythromycin (type-Macrolide) were shown to contain resistant bacteria, with the except of
agents B and E; the same for Norploxacin (type-Quinoline) and Neomycin antibiotics. Aminoglycosides such as Gentamycin and Streptomycin contained resistant bacteria, excluding agent B. Oxytetracyclin (type-Tetracycline),
which is banned for use as resistant bacteria showed the highest sensitivity among the 12 antibiotics,revealed positive results in the test for resistant bacteria; again excluding of agents B and E. These results
reveal that many agents contained resistant bacteria despite the fact that they were prohibited; this calls for a more accurate display of the facts and specifications, systematic distributions and strict verification processes
of environment improving agents.

참고자료

· 없음