연구규범과 가치관을 통해 본 한국 과학기술자사회의 성격: 공공부문 연구자를 중심으로 (Norms and Values of Korean Scientific Community)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 기술경영경제학회
· 수록지 정보 : 기술혁신연구 / 16권 / 1호 / 81 ~ 106페이지
· 저자명 : 박희제

초록

By analyzing a nation-wide survey, this article examines research related
norms and values of 684 scientists in 16 universities and 7 government supported
research institutes. The survey shows that Korean scientific community tends to reject
communality and disinterestedness while it accepts universalism as a norm. Organized
skepticism is received a lukewarm support. In contrast, Korean scientific community
tends to perceive the intellectual property and secrecy as legitimate and believe that
scientists should consider the applicability of scientific research outcome and its social impacts when they choose research topics. When other variables are controlled for, the
more basic research a scientist conducts the scientist is more likely to support
communality and reject secrecy. The younger scientists are less likely to accept
disinterestedness and the claim that the scientists should keep distance from social issues
than the older. Scientists who work in the government-supported research institutes are
more likely to view secrecy for more than 6 months as legitimate and reject the claim
that science should not be affected by society than university scientists. The implications
of these findings are discussed.

영어초록

By analyzing a nation-wide survey, this article examines research related
norms and values of 684 scientists in 16 universities and 7 government supported
research institutes. The survey shows that Korean scientific community tends to reject
communality and disinterestedness while it accepts universalism as a norm. Organized
skepticism is received a lukewarm support. In contrast, Korean scientific community
tends to perceive the intellectual property and secrecy as legitimate and believe that
scientists should consider the applicability of scientific research outcome and its social impacts when they choose research topics. When other variables are controlled for, the
more basic research a scientist conducts the scientist is more likely to support
communality and reject secrecy. The younger scientists are less likely to accept
disinterestedness and the claim that the scientists should keep distance from social issues
than the older. Scientists who work in the government-supported research institutes are
more likely to view secrecy for more than 6 months as legitimate and reject the claim
that science should not be affected by society than university scientists. The implications
of these findings are discussed.

참고자료

· 없음