三韓一統意識은 7세기의 이념인가 - 백제병합론의 반론에 대한 재론- (Was the “Three Hans were One” Notion(三韓一統意識) a product of the 7th century? : Counter-arguing to the critical response from the “Annexed Baekje” Theory)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국고대사학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국고대사연구 / 93호 / 265 ~ 307페이지
· 저자명 : 윤경진

초록

이 연구는 신라의 삼한일통의식이 7세기의 이념이라는 기존 견해에서 제기한 비판을 반박하고, 9세기에 비로소 출현했다는 이해를 재확인한 것이다. 특히 신라가 백제를 병합한 것에 불과하다는 주장에서 제기한 논점을 중심으로 검토하였다. 그 결과 7세기 신라의 영토의식을 반영하는 “平壤已南 百濟土地”에 고구려는 포함되지 않으며, 신라가 나당전쟁의 결과로 도달했다는 “高句麗 南境”은 대동강을 가리키는 것임을 재차 확인하였다. 또한 金庾信 獻議는 魏徵의 사례를 가지고 가공한 것이며, 무열왕의 太宗 諡號를 三韓의 一統과 연결한 것은 후대의 인식임도 확인하였다.
그리고 신라말에 출현하는 四郡 인식은 신라가 海東에 포함되는 존재들을 자신의 역사로 수용한 결과이며, 삼한일통의식의 균열이 아니라 확립을 보여주는 것으로 파악되었다.

영어초록

This article is a response to a recent critical analysis raised from a rather traditional perspective which had been viewing the Shilla dynasty’s “Three Hans were one” notion as an ideological one formed in the 7th century. In this article such view is again rebutted, while it is maintained that the said notion was formed only in the 9th century. The point in contention (particularly in this article) is a previous argument that Shilla was only able to ‘annex’ Baekje.
Examination in this article once again confirmed that a historical reference which said “Lands south of Pyeong’yang has been part of Baekje’s territory(平壤已南 百濟土地),” a line which in itself reveals how Shilla perceived its own territory in the 7th century, was a reference which did not actually include the territory of Goguryeo, and that the so-called “Southern border of Goguryeo(高句麗 南境),” which Shilla supposedly reached at the end of conflicts between itself and Dang, was in fact referring to no other than the Daedong-gang river. Meanwhile, the “Suggestion[‘Heon’eui, 獻議’] of Kim Yushin(金庾信)” seems to have been fabricated using the story of Wi Jing(魏徵), and people in later periods were obviously who recognized King Mu’yeol-wang’s posthumous title “Taejong(太宗)” and the “Samhan Iltong(三韓一統)” notion as being connected with each other.
Added to that, the “Four Gun(四郡)“ notion which surfaced at the end of the Shilla period seems as a result of Shilla absorbing all Haedong(“East side of China, 海東”) entities into its own history. In that regard, it should be considered as an evidence, not to the collapse of the Samhan Iltong notion but instead the consolidation of it.

참고자료

· 없음