사상으로서의 야나기 무네요시 읽기 -야나기 무네요시(柳宗悅)의 조선 예술론과 진정성- (Read Yanagi Muneyoshi as idea - The authenticity of Korean art theory Yanagi Muneyoshi -)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국일본언어문화학회
· 수록지 정보 : 일본언어문화 / 24호 / 507 ~ 527페이지
· 저자명 : 이병진

초록

Among Koreans look for a way of life not seen concrete style of the people ofKorea vivid Yanagi Muneyoshi(1889-1961, scholar and art critic folk). There is alsoa possibility that there was in Korea as aesthetic object rather than in Korea asthe others. Such a question is amplified through the depiction of the landscape tothe rhythm of his exquisite sensibility among Korean travel Yanagi. This paper isto try to clarify by examining the flow of the history of his thought centered onthe school birch the problem of sensitivity of willow that is formed in the yearsaround 1919 such problems.
Japan while toward imperialism in explicit 1910s as if Japan’s annexation of theKorean Peninsula, age seem to democracy and humanism if they were thriving, KojinKaratani on the other hand is in Japan ambiguity of the period ambiguity of willowthat is I pointed out to be related with. There is no longer be able to separate theattitude aesthetic of his morality willow did you request the release of the Koreanpeople for the ‘beauty’ after valley pattern, it is such deep If you do not have that‘beauty’ however I have rated, would have been no intervention. I think there aremany places like this change of evaluation of the willow suggests. Gaze of Yanagi’sthing to the interest to the people of Korea that was manufactured in Korea beauty,rather than as an aesthetic object. That is, the theory of art as a potential new KoreanYanagi as an assessment of the port orientalis. This paper is to examine aspectsof the theory of art-historical thought of Yanagi Muneyoshi Korea from such aposition.

영어초록

Among Koreans look for a way of life not seen concrete style of the people ofKorea vivid Yanagi Muneyoshi(1889-1961, scholar and art critic folk). There is alsoa possibility that there was in Korea as aesthetic object rather than in Korea asthe others. Such a question is amplified through the depiction of the landscape tothe rhythm of his exquisite sensibility among Korean travel Yanagi. This paper isto try to clarify by examining the flow of the history of his thought centered onthe school birch the problem of sensitivity of willow that is formed in the yearsaround 1919 such problems.
Japan while toward imperialism in explicit 1910s as if Japan’s annexation of theKorean Peninsula, age seem to democracy and humanism if they were thriving, KojinKaratani on the other hand is in Japan ambiguity of the period ambiguity of willowthat is I pointed out to be related with. There is no longer be able to separate theattitude aesthetic of his morality willow did you request the release of the Koreanpeople for the ‘beauty’ after valley pattern, it is such deep If you do not have that‘beauty’ however I have rated, would have been no intervention. I think there aremany places like this change of evaluation of the willow suggests. Gaze of Yanagi’sthing to the interest to the people of Korea that was manufactured in Korea beauty,rather than as an aesthetic object. That is, the theory of art as a potential new KoreanYanagi as an assessment of the port orientalis. This paper is to examine aspectsof the theory of art-historical thought of Yanagi Muneyoshi Korea from such aposition.

참고자료

· 없음