피부감작능 평가 대체시험법간 위양성 및 위음성 화학물질에 대한 인체 세포주 활성화방법의 전수에 따른 예측력 평가 (Skin Sensitizing Predictability on Chemical Substances with False Positivity or Negativity Following the Transfer of Human Cell Line Activation Test)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국동물실험대체법학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국동물실험대체법학회지 / 14권 / 1호 / 15 ~ 21페이지
· 저자명 : 조아랑, 여경욱, 정미숙, 이재희, 양수정, Ravi Gautam, 이기용, 조지훈, Manju Acharya, Anju Maharjan, 김창열, 허용

초록

The in vitro alternative assay for evaluating skin sensitizing potentials (SSP) called human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) has been recently adopted as an international test guideline. The present study was proceeded to pursue the domestic establishment and expansion of h-CLAT. The standard operational procedure was prepared in detail by the lead laboratory (LL) and transferred to one participating laboratory (PL). The LL demonstrated technical proficiency for the 10 substances listed in OECD TG 442E. The PL also demonstrated a certain level of proficiency, in that 4-phenylenediamine and 4-aminobenzoic acid distributed with coded names were correctly classified as positive and negative on SSP, respectively, and other indices including 75% cell viability (CV75) and relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) % for CD54 and CD86 were fell within the reference range. Methyl methacrylate, nickel chloride, and resorcinol, which are inconsistent in predicting SSP through various alternative test methods, were unanimously predicted as negative, positive, and positive on SSP by the two laboratories for the first time through h-CLAT. Both chlorobenzene and sodium lauryl sulfate with the existing h-CLAT report as positive and negative, respectively, were predicted as negative by the PL, which could contribute toward overall categorization into non-skin sensitizer.

영어초록

The in vitro alternative assay for evaluating skin sensitizing potentials (SSP) called human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) has been recently adopted as an international test guideline. The present study was proceeded to pursue the domestic establishment and expansion of h-CLAT. The standard operational procedure was prepared in detail by the lead laboratory (LL) and transferred to one participating laboratory (PL). The LL demonstrated technical proficiency for the 10 substances listed in OECD TG 442E. The PL also demonstrated a certain level of proficiency, in that 4-phenylenediamine and 4-aminobenzoic acid distributed with coded names were correctly classified as positive and negative on SSP, respectively, and other indices including 75% cell viability (CV75) and relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) % for CD54 and CD86 were fell within the reference range. Methyl methacrylate, nickel chloride, and resorcinol, which are inconsistent in predicting SSP through various alternative test methods, were unanimously predicted as negative, positive, and positive on SSP by the two laboratories for the first time through h-CLAT. Both chlorobenzene and sodium lauryl sulfate with the existing h-CLAT report as positive and negative, respectively, were predicted as negative by the PL, which could contribute toward overall categorization into non-skin sensitizer.

참고자료

· 없음