생활세계의 위상학과 일상사 —역사주의의 극복과 재건을 위한 현상학적 연구(2) : ‘장소’의 구체성을 위해 (The Lebenswelt’s Topology and the Alltagsgeschichte — a phenomenological study for overcoming and reconstructing of historicism(2): for the concreteness of place —)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국동서철학회
· 수록지 정보 : 동서철학연구 / 75호 / 473 ~ 499페이지
· 저자명 : 송석랑

초록

이 논문은 역사주의 이후의 역사주의라 할 수있는 ‘위상학적 역사주의’의 수준에서 우리가 취할 수 있는 ‘최선의’ 혹은 ‘더 나은’ 역사인식의 토대’(역사철학)가 어떤 것인지를 ‘일상사’(Alltagsgeschichte)와 현상학의 위상학적 상관성을 통해 비판적으로 구명하려 시도한 일련의 세 연구주제들 (즉, ① 역사주의와 일상사의 연계성을 현상학의 양상들에 수반하는 “생활세계”의 ‘위상학’(topology)을 매개로 삼아 정리한 후, ② 일상사의 난제들을 극복할 현상학의 위상학적 논리를 제시함으로써, ‘역사주의 이후의 역사주의’로서의 ‘위상학적 역사주의’를 해명한다. 그리고 ③일상사의 양상을 ‘두 경향으로 분류 가능한 현상학의 관점들’에 입각해 분석함으로써, 일상사와 ‘위상학적 역사주의’의 현상학적 연계성을 구체화 하며, 일상사의 주요 현안들인 체계성, 보편성, 정치성 중 특히 정치성에 연관된 문제들을 보다 더 정당하게 해소할 하나의 길을 제시한다.) 중 ③에 관한 연구다. 요컨대, 이 연구는 이론(현상학적 역사 ‘존재/인식’론)과 이에 입각한 실천(일상사의 역사서술)의 유기적 측면에서 일상사의 체계성과 보편성의 문제를 정치성의 문제로 수렴해 현상학의 위상학적 논리로 해소하면서 ‘역사주의 이후의 역사주의’, 즉 ‘위상학적 역사주의’의 한 윤곽을 제시했다.

영어초록

Although the historicism becomes an object that have to be overcome by positivism and presentism for it's factor of the metaphysical abstract, contrary to the positivism and presentism's view of giving a tacit consent to a agnosticism the historicism doesn't give up an ardent wish for ontological and epistemological inquire into history. The problem have to be solved first of all to present a type of historicism comes after historicism is an establishment of good subjectivity that can cognize historical fact as itself. Of course in this case 'fact as itself' is inseparable from our subject. So the establishment will be possible through not the positivism's view of Lanke or presentism's logic but new subject that does not allow all kind of relativity even beyond human's subjective. However to solve exactly this problem needs to take not only new method going over former attempts including historicism's but also new method considering phenomenology in all its various aspects. For getting that establishment, I take the fellowing three themes (First: searching examination into the relation between phenomenology's or topological thought of the life world's various aspects and the history of everyday life which correspond mutually to the various aspects. Second: presenting a topological logic of overcoming the knotty subject of history of everyday life, from which elucidates a historicism comes after historicism as a topological historicism. Third: reading some noted history of everyday life in the analytical point of topological views of phenomenology to embody the relation between a topological historicism and history of everyday life, and presenting the best one of topological logics that can answer to the difficult outstanding questions, for example the nature of micro point of view, anti theory, non political standpoint, which argues for the possibility of a historicism comes after historicism.) This paper treats the third of the three themes. In short; gathering the problems of systemicity and universality of <the history of everyday life as a rerum gestarum memoria> into the problem of political nature of it on the side of organic relation between a phenomenology and historical cognition, this paper analyses the problems through the topological logic of phenomenology, and presents an outline of a sound <historicism comes after historicism> or topological historicism.

참고자료

· 없음