방법으로서의 ‘일대일로’ ― 원톄쥔 학파의 관점에 기대어 (‘One Belt One Road’ As a Methodology: Based on the Perspective of Wen Tie-jun School)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국중국현대문학학회
· 수록지 정보 : 중국현대문학 / 91호 / 79 ~ 103페이지
· 저자명 : 공상철

초록

This thesis aims to understand the existential method of reality in ‘China’ and its ontological thickness by reviewing the ‘One Belt, One Road’ which is the biggest pending issue of the recent ‘China issues’ in the perspective of Wen Tie-jun school. In other words, this is a methodological attempt to draw a new task of sinology by relocating the existential method and thickness within the ‘rational description system of interpretation and explanation’.
According to Wen Tie, the ‘One Belt, One Road’ is a strategy to pioneer an exterior space for handling the excessive productivity and excessive financial profits within China. At the same time, the ‘One Belt, One Road’ is a strategy of China to break through the U. S’ scheme to surround the land power with the marine power. However, the meaning here is already spreading even to the layer of the history of civilization after exceeding the level of world strategy. This planning might be the starting point and the conclusion of ‘China issues’ that China currently faces.
In the reality of academia where the recent demands for interdisciplinary ‘crossing’ and ‘convergence’ are gradually increasing, the ‘One Belt, One Road’ suggests a methodological model that includes the extensive area from political economy to philosophy of history, from geopolitics to geoeconomics, from cultural history to theory of civilization, and from discourse to policy. The ‘One Belt, One Road’ itself suggests a field of new general studies to us.

영어초록

This thesis aims to understand the existential method of reality in ‘China’ and its ontological thickness by reviewing the ‘One Belt, One Road’ which is the biggest pending issue of the recent ‘China issues’ in the perspective of Wen Tie-jun school. In other words, this is a methodological attempt to draw a new task of sinology by relocating the existential method and thickness within the ‘rational description system of interpretation and explanation’.
According to Wen Tie, the ‘One Belt, One Road’ is a strategy to pioneer an exterior space for handling the excessive productivity and excessive financial profits within China. At the same time, the ‘One Belt, One Road’ is a strategy of China to break through the U. S’ scheme to surround the land power with the marine power. However, the meaning here is already spreading even to the layer of the history of civilization after exceeding the level of world strategy. This planning might be the starting point and the conclusion of ‘China issues’ that China currently faces.
In the reality of academia where the recent demands for interdisciplinary ‘crossing’ and ‘convergence’ are gradually increasing, the ‘One Belt, One Road’ suggests a methodological model that includes the extensive area from political economy to philosophy of history, from geopolitics to geoeconomics, from cultural history to theory of civilization, and from discourse to policy. The ‘One Belt, One Road’ itself suggests a field of new general studies to us.

참고자료

· 없음