‘关于’와 ‘对于’의 의미 기능 및 술어 유형 비교 ― 부사어 용법을 중심으로 (A Comparative Study on the Semanic Function and Predicate Types of ‘Guanyu’ and ‘Duiyu’ - Focused on adverbial uses)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 고려대학교 중국학연구소
· 수록지 정보 : 중국학논총 / 77호 / 1 ~ 23페이지
· 저자명 : 유위, 신미경

초록

This paper examined the difference between ‘Guanyu’ and ‘Duiyu’ of prepositions. To this end, this paper first distinguished the semantic difference between ‘Guanyu’ and ‘Duiyu’. Next, we examined the relationship between ‘Guanyu’ and ‘Duiyu’ with the predicate, and analyzed the difference in the components required in the sentence. Finally, we looked at the types and characteristics of objects and predicates used together with the two vocabulary words. The results of the discussion in this paper can be summarized into the following three.
First, ‘Guanyu’ mainly represents related objects or events described by subsequent sentences. In contrast, ‘Duiyu’ represents an object to take an attitude toward an actor or an object to take an action.
Second, ‘Guanyu’ represents the topic, and the subsequent sentence corresponds to the comment on the topic. A sentence using ‘Guanyu’ consists of two elements: a topic and a comment. In contrast, ‘Duiyu’ represents the object of application. Therefore, unlike ‘Guanyu’, a sentence using ‘Duiyu’ consists of three elements.
Third, ‘Duiyu’ is difficult to use with verbs that represent specific movements. In contrast, ‘Guanyu’ has no such restriction. The object of ‘Duiyu’ generally has a direct or indirect relationship with the predicate. However, the object of ‘Guanyu’ does not necessarily have a relationship with the predicate. Therefore, in order for ‘Guanyu’ and ‘Duiyu’ to be used compatibly, several conditions must be satisfied.

영어초록

This paper examined the difference between ‘Guanyu’ and ‘Duiyu’ of prepositions. To this end, this paper first distinguished the semantic difference between ‘Guanyu’ and ‘Duiyu’. Next, we examined the relationship between ‘Guanyu’ and ‘Duiyu’ with the predicate, and analyzed the difference in the components required in the sentence. Finally, we looked at the types and characteristics of objects and predicates used together with the two vocabulary words. The results of the discussion in this paper can be summarized into the following three.
First, ‘Guanyu’ mainly represents related objects or events described by subsequent sentences. In contrast, ‘Duiyu’ represents an object to take an attitude toward an actor or an object to take an action.
Second, ‘Guanyu’ represents the topic, and the subsequent sentence corresponds to the comment on the topic. A sentence using ‘Guanyu’ consists of two elements: a topic and a comment. In contrast, ‘Duiyu’ represents the object of application. Therefore, unlike ‘Guanyu’, a sentence using ‘Duiyu’ consists of three elements.
Third, ‘Duiyu’ is difficult to use with verbs that represent specific movements. In contrast, ‘Guanyu’ has no such restriction. The object of ‘Duiyu’ generally has a direct or indirect relationship with the predicate. However, the object of ‘Guanyu’ does not necessarily have a relationship with the predicate. Therefore, in order for ‘Guanyu’ and ‘Duiyu’ to be used compatibly, several conditions must be satisfied.

참고자료

· 없음