일부지역 주민들의 구강환경관리 및 요인분석 (Oral Hygiene Management and Factor Analysis of the Community People)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국치위생과학회
· 수록지 정보 : 치위생과학회지 / 10권 / 1호 / 11 ~ 16페이지
· 저자명 : 박향숙, 김진수, 김진미, 김윤신

초록

The subjects of this study were patients at scaling practice, the total number of the subjects was 249 of 138men and 111 women. The results were analyzed using SPSS 12.0. 1. In oral health care, among tooth brushing methods,scrub method was found to be 65.9%(164 patients), and 83.9%(209 patients) did not use oral care aids. 2. Mean calculus index was 0.57 ± 0.22. 3. For calculus index per tooth brushing method, there was statistically significant difference in all of the upper jaw, the lower jaw, the anterior portion, and the posterior portion(p < 0.05). 4. For calculus index per frequency of tooth brushing, there was statistically significant difference in the upper jaw, the lower jaw, and the posterior portion(p < 0.05). 5. For calculus index per time of tooth brushing and per use of oral care aids, there was statistically significant difference in all of the upper jaw, the lower jaw, the anterior portion, and the posterior portion(p < 0.05). 6. For factors influencing calculus index, as a result of applying stepwise method based on 0.05 of significance level, age, use of oral care aids, sex, and time of tooth brushing were found to influence calculus index. Final regression model was calculus index = 0.362*age + 0.216*use of oral care aids - 0.161*sex - 0.127*time of tooth brushing, and explanatory power of the model was 23.4%.

영어초록

The subjects of this study were patients at scaling practice, the total number of the subjects was 249 of 138men and 111 women. The results were analyzed using SPSS 12.0. 1. In oral health care, among tooth brushing methods,scrub method was found to be 65.9%(164 patients), and 83.9%(209 patients) did not use oral care aids. 2. Mean calculus index was 0.57 ± 0.22. 3. For calculus index per tooth brushing method, there was statistically significant difference in all of the upper jaw, the lower jaw, the anterior portion, and the posterior portion(p < 0.05). 4. For calculus index per frequency of tooth brushing, there was statistically significant difference in the upper jaw, the lower jaw, and the posterior portion(p < 0.05). 5. For calculus index per time of tooth brushing and per use of oral care aids, there was statistically significant difference in all of the upper jaw, the lower jaw, the anterior portion, and the posterior portion(p < 0.05). 6. For factors influencing calculus index, as a result of applying stepwise method based on 0.05 of significance level, age, use of oral care aids, sex, and time of tooth brushing were found to influence calculus index. Final regression model was calculus index = 0.362*age + 0.216*use of oral care aids - 0.161*sex - 0.127*time of tooth brushing, and explanatory power of the model was 23.4%.

참고자료

· 없음