《歸藏易》硏究之顧與評議

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 중국학연구회
· 수록지 정보 : 중국학연구 / 58호 / 641 ~ 676페이지
· 저자명 : 賴貴三

초록

The Classics_Zhouli-Chunguan-Zongbo-Taibu was written the contents to be in charge of the law about three Yi_ Lianshan, Guicang and Zhouyi, all the classic trigrams were eight divinatory symbols and their differentiated hexagrams were 64 ancient divination symbols. The scholars traditionally deemed that Guicang was ascribed to the Yinshang period and the first hexagram was ‘Kun’, so it was named Guicang. Guicang was’nt recorded into Hanshu-Yiwenzhi, but Suishu-Jingjizhi was recorded as below: “Guicang had been lost in the beginning of Han Dynasty, Zhongjing in Jin Danasty had only been recorded the divination but dissimilar to the Saint’s implication.” So we can know Guicang has been lost after Wei-Jin Dynasties. Confucian scholar_ Ma Guo-Han（1794-1857）in Qing Dynasty collected the lost Guicang in his masterpiece_ Yuhan-Shanfang Jiyishu. Until now the famous work is still based on by the current scholars. However the scholars in all the past dynasties always unceasingly debated and had’nt obtained the identical opinions. Fortunately, the 15th Qin tomb at Wangjiatai, Jiangling City, Hubei Province in March, 1993 had been come out of an excavation_ Guicang（Wangjiatai-Qinjian-Guicang）, therefore again unsealed the great mass fervor to research Guicang. The main aims of this paper not only collate the research results about Guicang-Yi, but also proceed the retrospection and review about the studies. The author sincerely hopes the scholars can return into the root and initiate the new aspects. The paper can be provided the scholars for investigating the indistinction and be required the contemplation and reference resources upon the research of Guicang-Yi.

참고자료

· 없음