역사수업에서 일진회 다루기 -역사적 사고력과 역사의식의 측면에서- (Dealing with Ilchinhoe in history class -In terms of historical thinking and historical consciousness-)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 역사교육학회
· 수록지 정보 : 역사교육논집 / 73호 / 115 ~ 153페이지
· 저자명 : 김종준

초록

What kind of historical consciousness is set as the goal of history education has a great influence on how the history narrative is composed. Biased narratives make it difficult to comprehend historical reality, which in turn distorts historical perceptions of individual historical objects. The example of history education for the group called Ilchinhoe, which was created in 1904 and lasted until 1910, is a good example. Even state textbooks, approval textbooks, and even alternative textbooks cannot escape the dichotomous confrontation of pro-Japanese traitor for Ilchinhoe. However, this does not reflect the new research results of Ilchinhoe. Ilchinhoe's activities should be understood as the non-vesting interests of the people, who began political campaigns to satisfy their political and economic needs, and then fell into “traitor” groups in the process of colonization. In addition, the succession of the Independent Association and the Ilchinhoe should not be hidden and subordinated to the national movement.
How can We deal with Ilchinhoe in history class? I think it can be used to reflect on our community in terms of citizenship. First, we need to understand what the historical narrative of the Patriot Enlightenment Movement, including Ilchinhoe, is. And as an oppositional narrative, we can empathize with how the Enlightenment and the Volunteer Corps Movement were viewed from People's point of view. Second, it can be used as a material for political debate about what our current sense of history should be. Whether we call it citizenship or national consciousness, we look into the history what kind of historical consciousness our community should have. The reasons why those who joined the Ilchinhoe group made such choices, whether they could be justified, and what criticisms they received from the contemporary and later generations can all be the subject of political debate. Ilchinhoe, for example, clearly contains elements that generally allow commentators to say that they are pre-modern characteristics of democracy. Nevertheless, the reason for the neglect is because the populist limits are clear and it is inconvenient to talk about them.

영어초록

What kind of historical consciousness is set as the goal of history education has a great influence on how the history narrative is composed. Biased narratives make it difficult to comprehend historical reality, which in turn distorts historical perceptions of individual historical objects. The example of history education for the group called Ilchinhoe, which was created in 1904 and lasted until 1910, is a good example. Even state textbooks, approval textbooks, and even alternative textbooks cannot escape the dichotomous confrontation of pro-Japanese traitor for Ilchinhoe. However, this does not reflect the new research results of Ilchinhoe. Ilchinhoe's activities should be understood as the non-vesting interests of the people, who began political campaigns to satisfy their political and economic needs, and then fell into “traitor” groups in the process of colonization. In addition, the succession of the Independent Association and the Ilchinhoe should not be hidden and subordinated to the national movement.
How can We deal with Ilchinhoe in history class? I think it can be used to reflect on our community in terms of citizenship. First, we need to understand what the historical narrative of the Patriot Enlightenment Movement, including Ilchinhoe, is. And as an oppositional narrative, we can empathize with how the Enlightenment and the Volunteer Corps Movement were viewed from People's point of view. Second, it can be used as a material for political debate about what our current sense of history should be. Whether we call it citizenship or national consciousness, we look into the history what kind of historical consciousness our community should have. The reasons why those who joined the Ilchinhoe group made such choices, whether they could be justified, and what criticisms they received from the contemporary and later generations can all be the subject of political debate. Ilchinhoe, for example, clearly contains elements that generally allow commentators to say that they are pre-modern characteristics of democracy. Nevertheless, the reason for the neglect is because the populist limits are clear and it is inconvenient to talk about them.

참고자료

· 없음