건설업 안전보건경영시스템 실행의 성숙도 분석 (The Analysis of Maturity on Implementation of Safety and Health Management System in a Construction Company)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국재난정보학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국재난정보학회 논문집 / 8권 / 3호 / 310 ~ 318페이지
· 저자명 : 오병섭, 권창희

초록

본 연구의 목적은 국내 안전보건경영시스템의 올바른 정착과 지속적인 개선을 통한 산업재해를 줄이기 위한 시스템 성숙도평가를 제안하는데 있다. KOSHA 18001시스템 실행의 현재 수준파악과 성숙도 측정의 검증을 통한 결과로서 다음 내용으로 요약된다. 시스템의 지속적인 성숙도 등급 향상을 위해서는 경영층 인식부문(의사결정) 46.0%, 본사지원활동 32.0%, 현장실행참여 22.0%로 중요도 로 검증되었다. 본사/현장의 활동은 위험성평가, 안전보건 재해예방활동, 성과평가 및 모니터링, 자원관리 및 지원, 경영검토 및 개선 등 활동의 중요도 순으로 실행 우선순위가 결정되었다. 또한, 전문가 그룹은 시스템의 강점, 약점, 개선주제를 제시함으로써 지속적인 개선활동과 연계시켜야 시스템을 정착할 수 있다고 제시하였다. 셋째, 안전보건경영시스템 실행의 성숙도 등급을 관리할 수 있는 도구를 제시하였다.

영어초록

Actual condition by items based on the level of execution of Construction Company certified by Construction Safety and Health Management Systems (KOSHA 18001) was investigated, analyzed and evaluated reflecting various opinions fincluding safety experts, top management, audit experts, and construction engineers. Currently, the maintenance is being managed through internal audit after the safety and health management system has been certified, but it is difficult to identify the degree of continuous improvement. In order to present the standards to see the level of quantified system, this study was conducted. The purpose of this study is to present the system maturity evaluation tool to be used to reduce occupational accidents through proper establishment and continuous improvement of national health and safety management system. Results of this study are summarized through identification of current condition of implementation of KOSHA 18001 system, development of maturity measurement tool and verification as follows: First, priority of implementation for activities of headquarters and on-site was determined by importance of activities such as the risk assessment, safety and health accident prevention activities, performance assessment and monitoring, resource management and support, and management review and improvement in order. In addition, the expert group presented that association with continuous improvement activities could establish the system by presenting strengths, weaknesses and improvement subjects of system.

참고자료

· 없음