한국어와 만주어의 직시 결합 동사 구문에 대한 대조 연구 (A contrastive approach to the deictic verb complex in Korean and Manchu)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국알타이학회
· 수록지 정보 : 알타이학보 / 30호 / 55 ~ 80페이지
· 저자명 : 최계영

초록

The deictic motion events in Manchu can be represented in two types of morphological constructions. One is the converb construction, in which the converb suffix connects the preceding verb with the following deictic verb, and the other is the derivative construction with the cislocative or the translocative suffix. This paper presents that these two constructions have different meanings and functions. The converb construction expresses the actual deictic motion of the agent as the core event, while the main event of the derivative construction is of the stem verb and the deictic movement in the whole event is incidental, unexplicit or unrealized. In the distribution, the verb participating in the motion event prefers either construction. Verbs that prefer deictic suffix are often telic, suggesting that the lexical aspects of the verbs are related to the semantics and functional differentiation of the two constructions. Unlike Manchu, Korean does not distinguish morphologically between deictic movement and deictic direction. Path verbs in Korean have limitations using without deictic verbs, but path verbs in Manchu do not necessarily require deictic verbs or deictic suffixes.

영어초록

The deictic motion events in Manchu can be represented in two types of morphological constructions. One is the converb construction, in which the converb suffix connects the preceding verb with the following deictic verb, and the other is the derivative construction with the cislocative or the translocative suffix. This paper presents that these two constructions have different meanings and functions. The converb construction expresses the actual deictic motion of the agent as the core event, while the main event of the derivative construction is of the stem verb and the deictic movement in the whole event is incidental, unexplicit or unrealized. In the distribution, the verb participating in the motion event prefers either construction. Verbs that prefer deictic suffix are often telic, suggesting that the lexical aspects of the verbs are related to the semantics and functional differentiation of the two constructions. Unlike Manchu, Korean does not distinguish morphologically between deictic movement and deictic direction. Path verbs in Korean have limitations using without deictic verbs, but path verbs in Manchu do not necessarily require deictic verbs or deictic suffixes.

참고자료

· 없음