임상약학, 임상약사, 임상약료와 임상약과학에 대한 인식도 조사 연구 (Studies on the Perception on Clinical Pharmaceutical Care and Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국임상약학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국임상약학회지 / 24권 / 3호 / 169 ~ 182페이지
· 저자명 : 장민정, 이장익, 조은애, 노하연

초록

Background: There exist some different perceptions on clinical pharmacy between Korean and western societies. Since the pharmacists who received the 6-year pharmacy education join the pharmacy profession soon, it appears imperative to know whether the western-style clinical pharmacy is adaptable to Korean-style pharmacy education and profession. Methods: The authors surveyed 54 professors in the membership directory of the Korean College of Clinical Pharmacy (KCCP) on their perceptions on clinical pharmacy and clinical pharmacists, and their willingness for adapting clinical pharmaceutical care (CPC) and clinical pharmaceutical sciences (CPS) into clinical pharmacy education. The survey consists of 47 questions including dichotomized and Likert scale questionnaires in the areas of respondent demographics, clinical pharmacy, clinical pharmacists, CPC and CPS. Results: Of the 54 KCCP members surveyed, 29 completed the questionnaires in full and one in part. It appears that most KCCP members acknowledge the existence and importance of the two major fields of clinical pharmacy, CPC and CPS. Twenty-eight (96.6%) and seventeen members (68.0%) agreed to introduce CPC and CPS into the clinical pharmacy education in Korea, respectively. Seventeen (63.0%) answered CPC would be successfully adapted in Korea. Twenty (74.1%) agreed that it is desirable for clinical pharmacists to perform CPC and CPS simultaneously. Conclusion: Based on this survey, the authors suggest that pharmacyschools provide their students with the education opportunities on CPC to nurture clinical pharmacists through a master’s program and CPS to foster clinical pharmaceutical scientists through a Ph.D. program.

영어초록

Background: There exist some different perceptions on clinical pharmacy between Korean and western societies. Sincethe pharmacists who received the 6-year pharmacy education join the pharmacy profession soon, it appears imperativeto know whether the western-style clinical pharmacy is adaptable to Korean-style pharmacy education and profession. Methods: The authors surveyed 54 professors in the membership directory of the Korean College of Clinical Pharmacy(KCCP) on their perceptions on clinical pharmacy and clinical pharmacists, and their willingness for adaptingclinical pharmaceutical care (CPC) and clinical pharmaceutical sciences (CPS) into clinical pharmacy education. Thesurvey consists of 47 questions including dichotomized and Likert scale questionnaires in the areas of respondent demographics,clinical pharmacy, clinical pharmacists, CPC and CPS. Results: Of the 54 KCCP members surveyed, 29 completedthe questionnaires in full and one in part. It appears that most KCCP members acknowledge the existence andimportance of the two major fields of clinical pharmacy, CPC and CPS. Twenty-eight (96.6%) and seventeen members(68.0%) agreed to introduce CPC and CPS into the clinical pharmacy education in Korea, respectively. Seventeen(63.0%) answered CPC would be successfully adapted in Korea. Twenty (74.1%) agreed that it is desirable for clinicalpharmacists to perform CPC and CPS simultaneously. Conclusion: Based on this survey, the authors suggest that pharmacyschools provide their students with the education opportunities on CPC to nurture clinical pharmacists through amaster’s program and CPS to foster clinical pharmaceutical scientists through a Ph.D. program.

참고자료

· 없음