트레겔레스 판과 웨스트코트 호트 판 차이점 연구 — 마태복음을 중심으로 — (A Study on the Differences between Tregelles’ Greek New Testament and Westcott and Hort’s Greek New Testament: In Concentration upon Matthew’s Gospel)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : (재)대한성서공회 성경번역연구소
· 수록지 정보 : 성경원문연구 / 56호 / 78 ~ 97페이지
· 저자명 : 박형대

초록

Sameul Prideux Tregelles’ Greek New Testament was published in 1879 after his death in 1875. At the prolegomena of the book, we find “the Rev. F. J. A. Hort, D.D., Pulsean Professor of Divinity” as an editor. The editor is a co-editor of the Westcott-Hort version, namely Fenton John Anthony Hort, and his son, Arthor Fenton Hort, gives evidence, “He [Hort] had been in constant communication with Tregelles for many years past, and freely used for his own work his collations and those of other scholars.” In addition, Timothy C. F. Stunt, who wrote the biography of S. P. Tregelles, revealed the relationship between Tregrelles and F. J. A. Hort.
Based on the evidence above, we may think a relationship between Tregelles’ GNT and Westcott and Hort’s GNT existed. Nevertheless, it is hard to find any mention of Tregelles’ version within both Westcott’s and Hort’s writings. Interestingly, Tregelles’ GNT is primarily used by both the Scrivener’s edition and the Palmer’s edition which were published in Oxford in 1881, the same year of the Westcott and Hort’s edition.
Hence, after examining Matthew’s Gospel in both versions, this study shows, first, that the differences between both versions can be primarily explained in terms of the Vatican manuscript. In particular, some readings in Westcott and Hort’s GNT are supported only by the Vatican manuscript based on CNTTS. In relation to these Westcott and Hort’s readings, the Palmer’s edition (1881) stands side by side with the Tregelles’ edition. Secondly, some differences can be explained by the Sinaiticus manuscript. Thirdly, some readings in Westcott and Hort’s GNT are supported by a few manuscripts which do not include the Sinaiticus and Vatican manuscripts.
Through this study, we think that there is a possibility that Tregelles’ GNT was used by Westcott and Hort’s Greek New Testament, and further, that Tregelles’ GNT was welcomed by the scholars in Oxford but rejected by those in Cambridge. Furthermore, we suggest that the Tregelles’ edition influenced, even indirectly, the earliest Korean translations from 1882 to 1911 that supposedly relied solely on the Palmer’s edition.
Hence, this study suggests a need to fully compare and examine the Tregelles’ edition not only with the Westcott and Hort’s GNT, but also with the Palmer’s edition.

영어초록

Sameul Prideux Tregelles’ Greek New Testament was published in 1879 after his death in 1875. At the prolegomena of the book, we find “the Rev. F. J. A. Hort, D.D., Pulsean Professor of Divinity” as an editor. The editor is a co-editor of the Westcott-Hort version, namely Fenton John Anthony Hort, and his son, Arthor Fenton Hort, gives evidence, “He [Hort] had been in constant communication with Tregelles for many years past, and freely used for his own work his collations and those of other scholars.” In addition, Timothy C. F. Stunt, who wrote the biography of S. P. Tregelles, revealed the relationship between Tregrelles and F. J. A. Hort.
Based on the evidence above, we may think a relationship between Tregelles’ GNT and Westcott and Hort’s GNT existed. Nevertheless, it is hard to find any mention of Tregelles’ version within both Westcott’s and Hort’s writings. Interestingly, Tregelles’ GNT is primarily used by both the Scrivener’s edition and the Palmer’s edition which were published in Oxford in 1881, the same year of the Westcott and Hort’s edition.
Hence, after examining Matthew’s Gospel in both versions, this study shows, first, that the differences between both versions can be primarily explained in terms of the Vatican manuscript. In particular, some readings in Westcott and Hort’s GNT are supported only by the Vatican manuscript based on CNTTS. In relation to these Westcott and Hort’s readings, the Palmer’s edition (1881) stands side by side with the Tregelles’ edition. Secondly, some differences can be explained by the Sinaiticus manuscript. Thirdly, some readings in Westcott and Hort’s GNT are supported by a few manuscripts which do not include the Sinaiticus and Vatican manuscripts.
Through this study, we think that there is a possibility that Tregelles’ GNT was used by Westcott and Hort’s Greek New Testament, and further, that Tregelles’ GNT was welcomed by the scholars in Oxford but rejected by those in Cambridge. Furthermore, we suggest that the Tregelles’ edition influenced, even indirectly, the earliest Korean translations from 1882 to 1911 that supposedly relied solely on the Palmer’s edition.
Hence, this study suggests a need to fully compare and examine the Tregelles’ edition not only with the Westcott and Hort’s GNT, but also with the Palmer’s edition.

참고자료

· 없음