오토기조시『슈텐동자(酒呑童子)』내러티브 고찰 - 요괴와 영웅의 가변적 정체성을 중심으로 - (A Study on the narrative of ‘shutenndouji’ in Otogizoshi - Focusing on the variable identity of demon and hero -)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국일어일문학회
· 수록지 정보 : 일어일문학연구 / 129권 / 215 ~ 235페이지
· 저자명 : 이용미

초록

これまで酒呑童子に関する研究は王権を脅かす悪者、地方の盗賊、もしくは疫病の象徴など、主に制度権側の立場から討伐すべき対象として論じられてきた。ところが本稿では人間対妖怪といった二項対立の構造から離れて、両者の可変的なアイデンティティの様相と相互の力関係について探った。まず、酒呑童子の築いた鬼ヶ城は単に鬼の住処ではなく、自らの政治と文化、もしくは社会秩序が整えられた理想郷であり、酒呑童子はまさに神性さえ帯びる為政者の位相が認められる。また源頼光と彼の家来であるいわゆる四天王は典型的な英雄の役割とイメージからかけ離れた姿として描かれている。すなわち、彼らは武勇と知恵を兼ね備えた武士であるというより、どちらかといえば神憑りのシャーマンとしての働きが浮彫りにしているといえる。 妖怪と英雄の話は話し手や享受層、そして時代によって変わり、談論の領域も異なってくると思われる。つまり、妖怪と英雄は自然と文化、混沌と秩序、野蛮と文明という二項対立の概念から生まれたものではない。両方はこれらすべての境界を行き来できる存在であるという面で、連動しあい、かつ拡大発展していく物語であるといえる。

영어초록

Until now, research on the shutendouji' narrative has been highlighted mainly as others who must defeat and subjugate from the standpoint of the establishment, such as royal opponents, bandits, or symbols of plague. However, in this paper, we tried to assess the new possibility of the shutendoujis' discourse by looking at the dynamics interworking with the variable identity patterns of the two, breaking away from the binary confrontation structure of humans versus monsters.
First of all, the fortification, which was built by shutendouji, is not just a grotto's den, but an ideal where its own politics, culture, and order exist, and shutendouji can be said to have the status of a politician who combines divinity. However, his utopia, which shows the prospect and reversal of human society, is eventually reduced to a dystopia due to the value monopoly of human beings who are hegemonic. On the other hand, the status of Yorimitsu's party, who invaded Oni, is also different from the role and status of typical heroes. In other words, the shamanic deity is highlighted rather than valor, and the suspicion of mean tricks and taboo violations is indelible rather than resourcefulness, settling into the status of an incomplete hero. The extensions of discourse expand as the monster and hero narratives are re-examined from a fluid and variable perspective according to the subject of narrative power, the nostalgia, and the times. In other words, it can be said that the monster and hero are not binary confrontations of nature and culture, anti-order and order, barbarism, and civilization, but both are beings that cross their boundaries, so they can be said to be narratives that expand and develop in conjunction with each other on the same horizon.

참고자료

· 없음