서구에서 국가권력과 역사서술: 프랑스혁명사 연구를 중심으로 (State Power and Historical Writings seen through the Historiography of French Revolution)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 역사학회
· 수록지 정보 : 역사학보 / 224호 / 31 ~ 53페이지
· 저자명 : 최갑수

초록

In traditional era chroniclers did not always write suiting power’s taste in spite of patronage, inversely modern history as a distinct discipline never deviated exceedingly from social, and even political demands. Nevertheless history as a separate discipline have achieved some relative independence from the state power and civil society, and have accomplished very rich and abundant outcomes copping with étatisme or nationalism. One of the most remarkable instances is the historiography of French Revolution, especially the ‘classical’ interpretation about it. However historical studies have not be- ing done in a vacuum, ultimately never overcoming its nature of ‘idéologie d’Etat’. In cases which historical studies exceed that maximum envelope in spite of public support and funding, the relative autonomy given to Aca- demia is plainly discarded and, in extreme circumstances, debates disclose bluntly their character of ideology disregarding its ‘scientific’ norm. One of the coup de theatre is François Furet’s defiance and diatribe on Albert So- boul. In this case, we witness that Public Sphere at domestic and internation- al level played in the long run a role as a final judge. Therefore we have to put together, not only the inner, but also external dimensions of Academia, not merely the effects of state power, but power relations of social forces, in order to understand properly the real worth of historical interpretations.

영어초록

In traditional era chroniclers did not always write suiting power’s taste in spite of patronage, inversely modern history as a distinct discipline never deviated exceedingly from social, and even political demands. Nevertheless history as a separate discipline have achieved some relative independence from the state power and civil society, and have accomplished very rich and abundant outcomes copping with étatisme or nationalism. One of the most remarkable instances is the historiography of French Revolution, especially the ‘classical’ interpretation about it. However historical studies have not be- ing done in a vacuum, ultimately never overcoming its nature of ‘idéologie d’Etat’. In cases which historical studies exceed that maximum envelope in spite of public support and funding, the relative autonomy given to Aca- demia is plainly discarded and, in extreme circumstances, debates disclose bluntly their character of ideology disregarding its ‘scientific’ norm. One of the coup de theatre is François Furet’s defiance and diatribe on Albert So- boul. In this case, we witness that Public Sphere at domestic and internation- al level played in the long run a role as a final judge. Therefore we have to put together, not only the inner, but also external dimensions of Academia, not merely the effects of state power, but power relations of social forces, in order to understand properly the real worth of historical interpretations.

참고자료

· 없음