• 전문가 요청 쿠폰 이벤트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

근대 여명기 일본의 조선정책과 宮本小一 (The Diplomatic Policy of Japan toward Korea in the Early Modern Era and Miyamoto Okadzu)

69 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.05.26 최종저작일 2010.06
69P 미리보기
근대 여명기 일본의 조선정책과 宮本小一
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 효원사학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 역사와 세계 / 37권 / 149 ~ 217페이지
    · 저자명 : 제홍일

    초록

    This article re-examines the diplomatic policy of Japan toward Korea in the early modern era. The previous interpretation was fixed by TabohashI Kiyoshi, the leading authority on the period. According to Tabohashi, the diplomatic policy was executed by hard-liners who insisted on strong diplomacy like <Seikanron>. The moderate-liners who insisted on the maintenance of the status quo were dismissed in Tabohashi’s research. Deliberately or not, researchers afterward have not paid attention to the moderate-liners either. Therefore, inevitably my research object is focused on the moderate policies which were insisted on by Miyamoto Okadzu. I clarify that it was Miyamoto who planned the most moderate diplomatic policy of Japan toward Korea from the establishment of Gaimusho (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) to the making the treaty of Ganghwado island. At the end of the year when the Gaimusho was established (1869), Miyamoto drafted <Chosenron>. It was extremely moderate and can be described as a ‘hands-off’ policy. It was a policy that could be accepted easily by the Korean court. Although there existed a fanatically strong policy like <Seikanron>, it was chiefly the moderate one that was executed. It is very important that it was not a strong policy but a moderate one which was insisted on by Miyamoto after 1869 to have concluded the treaty of Ganghwado island. Negotiation on the treaty was extremely moderate and passive because it was initiated by Miyamoto. Finally I also clarify that it was Miyamoto who planned and executed the appendix to the Ganghwado treaty. Therefore, negotiation on the appendix was also a moderate one. But there was a big problem of legation and a diplomatic agent. The problem was introduced by Enomoto Takeaki who had an idea of power politics based on the British style and the application of international law. Japanese diplomacy since the end of 1876 was converted from the moderate diplomacy of Miyamoto to the strong diplomacy of Enomoto and Hanabusa Yoshimoto.

    영어초록

    This article re-examines the diplomatic policy of Japan toward Korea in the early modern era. The previous interpretation was fixed by TabohashI Kiyoshi, the leading authority on the period. According to Tabohashi, the diplomatic policy was executed by hard-liners who insisted on strong diplomacy like <Seikanron>. The moderate-liners who insisted on the maintenance of the status quo were dismissed in Tabohashi’s research. Deliberately or not, researchers afterward have not paid attention to the moderate-liners either. Therefore, inevitably my research object is focused on the moderate policies which were insisted on by Miyamoto Okadzu. I clarify that it was Miyamoto who planned the most moderate diplomatic policy of Japan toward Korea from the establishment of Gaimusho (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) to the making the treaty of Ganghwado island. At the end of the year when the Gaimusho was established (1869), Miyamoto drafted <Chosenron>. It was extremely moderate and can be described as a ‘hands-off’ policy. It was a policy that could be accepted easily by the Korean court. Although there existed a fanatically strong policy like <Seikanron>, it was chiefly the moderate one that was executed. It is very important that it was not a strong policy but a moderate one which was insisted on by Miyamoto after 1869 to have concluded the treaty of Ganghwado island. Negotiation on the treaty was extremely moderate and passive because it was initiated by Miyamoto. Finally I also clarify that it was Miyamoto who planned and executed the appendix to the Ganghwado treaty. Therefore, negotiation on the appendix was also a moderate one. But there was a big problem of legation and a diplomatic agent. The problem was introduced by Enomoto Takeaki who had an idea of power politics based on the British style and the application of international law. Japanese diplomacy since the end of 1876 was converted from the moderate diplomacy of Miyamoto to the strong diplomacy of Enomoto and Hanabusa Yoshimoto.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2026년 03월 25일 수요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
10:19 오후