강릉 사마소의 운영과 관리주체의 변동 (Management of Gangneung Samaso and changes in the managing body)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국국학진흥원
· 수록지 정보 : 국학연구 / 40호 / 225 ~ 254페이지
· 저자명 : 이상균

초록

강릉에는 강원도 내에 유일하게 남아있는 사마소 유적이 있다. 강릉 사마소는 읍치인 옥천동玉川洞에 처음 설립되었다가 현 자리인 화부산花浮山 기슭으로 이설되고 흥폐를 거듭했다. 1810년 중수 후 당호를 ‘연행당讌杏堂’이라 했다. 1907년 후손들이 사마소 유지를 위해 중수하고 당호를 ‘계련당桂蓮堂’으로 변경했다. 사마소는 사마계에서 운영해 왔다. 과거제 폐지로 사마소 기능이 유명무실해진 이후에도 사마계원들은 사마소 재산의 기득권을 보장받고자 생전까지 계를 유지하려 했다. 그러나 사마계 후손들이 사마소 관리에 참여하여 그 후예임을 인정받고, 선조가 증식해 놓은 사마소 재산 유지와 관리 등을 위해 1906년 모선계를 결성한다. 이때 사마계원들은 사마소 재산의 처분을 시도했고, 모선계원들이 저지함으로써 양측의 분규가 일었다. 분규는 사마계원들에 의해 대부분의 사마소 재산이 처분되는 1930년경에 종식되며, 사마계원도 대부분 사망하여 사마계는 유야무야 되었다. 모선계에서는 사마소의 유지를 위해 사마계원들이 처분한 재산을 다시 사들였다. 이로써 사마소 관리주체가 모선계로 완전히 변동되어 지금에 이른다.

영어초록

There were Gyeryeonldang(桂蓮堂) of Samaso remains in the Gangneung. It is only samaso in the Gangwon-do. The period of making it was unknown but it was about 16C(Jung Jong (中宗) period) as finding sama-exam pass present condition. Originally it was established in a town of Okchen-dong and relocated Mt. Hwabu foot and was renovated. In 1766 Samadang was repaired and the name was Yeonhaengdang(讌杏堂) in 1810. Although past system was reformed in 1894(Kabo reform) descendant had a purpose of maintaining it and the name was Gyeryeonldang in 1907. Moseongye which was organized by descendant extensively repaired the Gyeryeondang from 1933 to 1935.
Samaso in Gangneung was managed by Samagy. There were no Samagy documents but main members were region gentry from successful candidate of sama-exam and many successful candidates in another region also participated in Samaso. Although the function of Samaso was nominal after Kabo reform(1894) members tried to guarantee vasted rights of property of samaso. In 1930 Samagy was noncommittal because most members were dead and the dispute of property in Samaso was ended.
In order to maintaining the property in Samaso and recognizing as descendant, descendant organized Moseongye and participating in managing Samaso(region gentry association) in 1906. However, they did not participate in Samagy. In this situation, Samagy tried to sell property of coming down from Samaso and Moseongye opposed it. It was dispute about Samaso property between Samagy and Moseongye. Duspute continues until 1930, they had not been able to reach an agreement. As a result, most properties were sold by Samagy the dispute was ended. However, Moseongye increased property in order to maintain Samaso and bought the site of Gyeryeonldang. This means management authority of Samaso is Moseongye and their efforts made maintain historic meaning and status of remains of Samaso until now. However, the dispute between Samagy and Moseongye shows the severance of historic correlation between Samagy and Samaso.

참고자료

· 없음