보건소 이미지 척도 개발 (Development of Public Health Center Image Scale)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국보건행정학회
· 수록지 정보 : 보건행정학회지 / 23권 / 4호 / 415 ~ 426페이지
· 저자명 : 이인영, 김은미, 배상수

초록

Background: This study was aim to identify the specific words and to develop the scale for the public health center (PHC) image.
Methods: We collected 824 words from the previous studies and by open questions and reduced them by 77 words, then whichwere rated properly by 355 citizens of Seoul. We examined explanatory factor analysis for 69 words, and examined content validitytest and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for the image structures (4 factors and 16 words). And then we developed the imagequestionnaire using them through council. We conducted a survey and retested the PHC image scales as the measuring tool targeting2,000 persons, and compared the inexperience and experience persons for PHC usage.
Results: The image structures were consisted of 4 factors and 16 words such as ‘trustworthiness’ (warm, exemplary, faithful, servicemindedness,beneficial to health), ‘fairness’ (honesty, clear, consistent, ruled), ‘development possibility’ (changing, goal-directed, developmental,propulsive), and ‘flexibility’ (not authoritative, not perfunctory, not rigid) in total. Cronbach’s α values of all factors wereabove 0.7. As a result of CFA, model fit indexes yielded satisfactory results (root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] 0.049,goodness of fit index [GFI] 0.937, and adjusted goodness of fit index [AGFI] 0.912). According to the result of retest for measuringtool by using other samples, Cronbach’s α values were above 0.8, and model fit indexes yielded satisfactory results (RMSEA 0.059,GFI 0.952, AGFI 0.933). RMSEAs of the inexperiences and the experiences were each 0.59, 0.68.
Conclusion: A reliable, valid, and generalizable scale was created for PHC image.

영어초록

Background: This study was aim to identify the specific words and to develop the scale for the public health center (PHC) image.
Methods: We collected 824 words from the previous studies and by open questions and reduced them by 77 words, then whichwere rated properly by 355 citizens of Seoul. We examined explanatory factor analysis for 69 words, and examined content validitytest and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for the image structures (4 factors and 16 words). And then we developed the imagequestionnaire using them through council. We conducted a survey and retested the PHC image scales as the measuring tool targeting2,000 persons, and compared the inexperience and experience persons for PHC usage.
Results: The image structures were consisted of 4 factors and 16 words such as ‘trustworthiness’ (warm, exemplary, faithful, servicemindedness,beneficial to health), ‘fairness’ (honesty, clear, consistent, ruled), ‘development possibility’ (changing, goal-directed, developmental,propulsive), and ‘flexibility’ (not authoritative, not perfunctory, not rigid) in total. Cronbach’s α values of all factors wereabove 0.7. As a result of CFA, model fit indexes yielded satisfactory results (root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] 0.049,goodness of fit index [GFI] 0.937, and adjusted goodness of fit index [AGFI] 0.912). According to the result of retest for measuringtool by using other samples, Cronbach’s α values were above 0.8, and model fit indexes yielded satisfactory results (RMSEA 0.059,GFI 0.952, AGFI 0.933). RMSEAs of the inexperiences and the experiences were each 0.59, 0.68.
Conclusion: A reliable, valid, and generalizable scale was created for PHC image.

참고자료

· 없음