『성호사설』의 屠隆 『鴻苞集』 인증에 대하여 (On the way of Yi Ik’s (李瀷) quotation and verification of Tu Long’s (屠隆) discourses from his Collected Writings of Hongbao (鴻苞集), in his Sŏngho’s Encyclopedic Discourse (星湖僿說))

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 근역한문학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한문학논집(漢文學論集) / 62권 / 145 ~ 168페이지
· 저자명 : 심경호

초록

屠隆은 『四庫提要』가 ‘이탁오의 아류’라고 혹평한 인물이다. 四庫館臣은 그의 『鴻苞集』을 雜家類 存目에 저록하고, 放誕하면서 駁雜한 데다가 잡문과 案牘을 마구 쌓아두었다고 비판했다. 하지만 도륭의 「荒政考」는 許穆(1595~1682)과 丁若鏞(1762~1836)에 의해 중시되었다. 그런데 李瀷(1681~1763)은 『星湖僿說』에서 8개 조항에서 「황정고」를 포함하여 도륭의 『홍포집』을 직접 인증했다. 그 내용은 대개 測候說, 經世說, 音學, 字學, 名物學에 관한 것이다. 도륭이 불교ㆍ도교를 유학 위에 두고 인생철학을 논한 것은 인용하지 않았다. 본고에서 밝히지 못했지만, 『성호사설』에는 도륭이 천문자연과 문화학술에 관해 논한 방식을 참조한 예가 더 있으리라 추정된다.

영어초록

This paper explores the way of Yi Ik’s (李瀷, 1681~1763) quotation and verification of Tu Long’s (屠隆) discourses from his Hongbao Ji (鴻苞集, Collected Works of Hongbao), in his Sŏngho Sasŏl (星湖僿說, Sŏngho’s Encyclopedic Discourse). Tu Long is an Scholar-official in the late Ming period who has been castigated in the Annotated Catalog of the Complete Work of the Four Libraries (四庫全書總目提要) as one of Li Zhuowu’s (李卓吾) epigones that the Compilation Committee of the Four Treasuries (四庫館臣), while classifying Hongbao Ji as “Miscellaneous Writings” (雜家類) in “available and checked books” (存目), censured it for its haphazard compilation and contents. However, his Examining Famine Relief Measures (荒政考) was valued by the Chosŏn literati including Hŏ Mok (許穆, 1595~1682) and Chŏng Yagyong (丁若鏞, 1762~1836), and Yi Ik, in his Sŏngho Sasŏl, quoted and validated his discourses on Heavenly Phenomena, Statecraft, Music, Paleography, and Names and their Referents from his writings including Examining Famine Relief Measures while he did not refer to the discourses devoted to philosophy of life based on the idea of predominance of Buddhism and Taoism over Confucianism. It is presumed that Sŏngho Sasŏl might supposedly subsume extracts regarding how Tu Long commented on celestial pattern, nature, culture, and scholarship, which has not been elucidated in this paper.

참고자료

· 없음