양측 종골 골절 환자의 치료 후 임상적 및 방사선학적 결과

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 대한족부족관절학회
· 수록지 정보 : 대한족부족관절학회지 / 16권 / 4호 / 229 ~ 234페이지
· 저자명 : 이정길, 김갑래, 구본재, 현윤석, 이효범, 이재희

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to find out clinical and radiological outcomes in 70 patients of both calcaneal fracture.
Materials and Methods: From March 1993 to March 2011, 70 patients underwent non-operative management or operative management at our hospital. Conservative management was performed in 15 cases of undisplaced fracture (Group A).
Operative management was performed in 125 cases including 32 cases of undisplaced fracture (Group B), 60 cases of joint depression type fracture (Group C), 33 cases of tongue type fracture (Group D). Results were evaluated by VAS score,AOFAS score, circle draw test, Bohler angle (BA), Gissane angle, width & height of calcaneus.
Results: VAS scores were 2.0 in group A, 2.0 in group B, 2.2 in group C, 2.7 in group D. AOFAS scores were 90.4 in group A, 91.9 in group B, 72.2 in group C, 79.2 in group D. Circle draw tests were 8.4 cm in group A, 10.1 cm in group B, 7.6 cm in group C, 7.9 cm in group D. Bohler angles (BA) and Gissane angles were 19.1˚, 96.7˚in group A, 21.8˚, 119.1˚in group B,26.3˚, 121.2˚in group C, 19.7˚, 119.7˚in group D. Calcaneal widths and heights were 39.5 mm, 31.6 mm in group A, 32.7mm, 37.0 mm in group B, 34.4 mm, 39.2 mm in group C, 35.2 mm, 38.7 mm in group D.
Conclusion: The main cause of bilateral calcaneal fracture is an injury from a fall, and the cases were more frequently occurred in men than women. Also the fracture in the right side tend to occur more severely compared to the left side. The surgical treatment shows better results than conservative treatment in bilateral calcaneal fracture.

참고자료

· 없음