공관서 병행 본문 번역에서 형식 일치와 내용 동등성의 조화 -『표준새번역』과 『새번역』을 중심으로- (Harmony of Formal Correspondence and Dynamic Equivalence in Translating Parallel Texts of the Synoptic Gospels)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : (재)대한성서공회 성경번역연구소
· 수록지 정보 : 성경원문연구 / 24호 / 72 ~ 92페이지
· 저자명 : 김재성

초록

While the Korean Revised Version adopted the principle of formal correspondence as its translation principle, the Common Translation adopted the principle of dynamic equivalence. The New Korean Standard Version did not selected one alternative of them but tried to maintain harmony between formal correspondence translation and dynamic equivalence translation.
The purpose of this paper is to review how much it is successful to maintain such a harmony in the New Korean Standard Version (NKSV) and the Revised New Korean Standard Version (RNKSV), especially in translating parallel texts of the synoptic Gospels.
For this purpose, we will first examine how NKSV and RNKSV translated some correspondent Greek texts into some diverse and different Korean expressions, contrasting the texts of the synoptic Gospels. And we will examine why such different expressions should be made in process of translation and if those expressions are necessary for Korean usage or not.
For this analysis, we will examine 1) phrases which added or omitted some words, 2) phrases which are different in honorific expressions, 3) phrases which are different in forms of quotation, 4) phrases which are assimilated to parallel text, 5) phrases which are different in tense and voice, and 6) phrases where comma either omitted or added, the exclamation mark or question mark or space are used or not etc. Then we will propose a new way for further translation through this analysis.

영어초록

While the Korean Revised Version adopted the principle of formal correspondence as its translation principle, the Common Translation adopted the principle of dynamic equivalence. The New Korean Standard Version did not selected one alternative of them but tried to maintain harmony between formal correspondence translation and dynamic equivalence translation.
The purpose of this paper is to review how much it is successful to maintain such a harmony in the New Korean Standard Version (NKSV) and the Revised New Korean Standard Version (RNKSV), especially in translating parallel texts of the synoptic Gospels.
For this purpose, we will first examine how NKSV and RNKSV translated some correspondent Greek texts into some diverse and different Korean expressions, contrasting the texts of the synoptic Gospels. And we will examine why such different expressions should be made in process of translation and if those expressions are necessary for Korean usage or not.
For this analysis, we will examine 1) phrases which added or omitted some words, 2) phrases which are different in honorific expressions, 3) phrases which are different in forms of quotation, 4) phrases which are assimilated to parallel text, 5) phrases which are different in tense and voice, and 6) phrases where comma either omitted or added, the exclamation mark or question mark or space are used or not etc. Then we will propose a new way for further translation through this analysis.

참고자료

· 없음