• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

決訟立案과 소송 현장, 그리고 노비의 삶 (Litigation Court and Nobi(奴婢)’s lives in Chosŏn Dynasty’s Kyŏlsong iban(決訟立案))

26 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.05.19 최종저작일 2018.09
26P 미리보기
決訟立案과 소송 현장, 그리고 노비의 삶
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 서울대학교 규장각한국학연구원
    · 수록지 정보 : 한국문화 / 83호 / 309 ~ 334페이지
    · 저자명 : 김경숙

    초록

    This article focuses on the reality of the caste system in the Chosŏn dynasty period by examining two litigation cases at Kyurye Hyŏn(1707) and Andong Pu(1722).
    The litigations processes were centered upon the (counter-)arguments made by plaintiffs and defendants, and the documentary evidences they produced respectively. Also, the officials in the charge of the lawsuits did their juridical judgements based upon the claims of those concerned and their evidential documents. For an example, Kim Pokryŏm, the plaintiff of the litigation at Andong Pu lost in the lawsuit filed by his nobi’s descendant because he neither presented himself at the court of lawsuit nor submitted to the court evidential documents supporting his arguments as he recountered. This example shows us that in the official court where private individuals legally struggled for their interests, the caste system did not work even if they differed from each other in their caste. It suggests to us that there was a space and time in which caste system did not work in the Chosŏn dynasty period. That is, it was not that the caste system always worked at any time and at any place contrary to our usual imaginations of the caste system in the Chosŏn dynasty period.
    Also, Kyŏlsong iban exposes to our sight Nobi’s real lives greatly different from our established images. Chŏng Ŭng-chŏng(?-1653) and Chongbok(circa 1634) were nobis who lived their lives at Kurye, Chŏlla province and Andong, Kyŏngsang province respectively in the early and mid 17th century. They, inheriting farmland from their ancestors and purchasing land from others, attained economically the rank of small landlord and socially of nobi owners. Even though they remained subordinate to their individual owners in terms of their caste as nobis, they, based upon their own riches and other socio-economic potentials, lived their affluent ordinary lives in other fields than in their relations with their owners.
    Then, the question arises to what extent the caste system and their caste as nobis wielded its power upon their other ordinary lives than their lives with their individual owners. The established literature concerned tend to explain nobi’s economic riches in terms of their rise of social status brought about against the historical background of the dissolution of rigid caste system as was argued to be in the late of Chosŏn dynasty. Given this, Chŏng Ŭng-chŏng’s and Chongbok’s lives draw our attention in that they lived their wealthy lives in the middle of Chosŏn dynasty not in the late of the dynasty. Their lives together with the litigations examined in the above put our established history writing on the caste system of Chosŏn dynasty into the question: Did the caste system wield its overall power upon all aspects of all the individuals’ lives in the Chosŏn dynasty period?

    영어초록

    This article focuses on the reality of the caste system in the Chosŏn dynasty period by examining two litigation cases at Kyurye Hyŏn(1707) and Andong Pu(1722).
    The litigations processes were centered upon the (counter-)arguments made by plaintiffs and defendants, and the documentary evidences they produced respectively. Also, the officials in the charge of the lawsuits did their juridical judgements based upon the claims of those concerned and their evidential documents. For an example, Kim Pokryŏm, the plaintiff of the litigation at Andong Pu lost in the lawsuit filed by his nobi’s descendant because he neither presented himself at the court of lawsuit nor submitted to the court evidential documents supporting his arguments as he recountered. This example shows us that in the official court where private individuals legally struggled for their interests, the caste system did not work even if they differed from each other in their caste. It suggests to us that there was a space and time in which caste system did not work in the Chosŏn dynasty period. That is, it was not that the caste system always worked at any time and at any place contrary to our usual imaginations of the caste system in the Chosŏn dynasty period.
    Also, Kyŏlsong iban exposes to our sight Nobi’s real lives greatly different from our established images. Chŏng Ŭng-chŏng(?-1653) and Chongbok(circa 1634) were nobis who lived their lives at Kurye, Chŏlla province and Andong, Kyŏngsang province respectively in the early and mid 17th century. They, inheriting farmland from their ancestors and purchasing land from others, attained economically the rank of small landlord and socially of nobi owners. Even though they remained subordinate to their individual owners in terms of their caste as nobis, they, based upon their own riches and other socio-economic potentials, lived their affluent ordinary lives in other fields than in their relations with their owners.
    Then, the question arises to what extent the caste system and their caste as nobis wielded its power upon their other ordinary lives than their lives with their individual owners. The established literature concerned tend to explain nobi’s economic riches in terms of their rise of social status brought about against the historical background of the dissolution of rigid caste system as was argued to be in the late of Chosŏn dynasty. Given this, Chŏng Ŭng-chŏng’s and Chongbok’s lives draw our attention in that they lived their wealthy lives in the middle of Chosŏn dynasty not in the late of the dynasty. Their lives together with the litigations examined in the above put our established history writing on the caste system of Chosŏn dynasty into the question: Did the caste system wield its overall power upon all aspects of all the individuals’ lives in the Chosŏn dynasty period?

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“한국문화”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
  • 전문가 요청 쿠폰 이벤트
  • 전문가요청 배너
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 12월 03일 수요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
4:17 오후