2018 러시아 월드컵 아시아 예선경기 중 한국 축구 국가대표팀의 포지션 및 15분 단위 경기력 비교 분석 (Comparative Analysis of Athletic Performance of Korea National Football Team by Position and by 15-minute Unit at the Asian Qualifier of the 2018 Russia World Cup)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국체육과학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국체육과학회지 / 27권 / 1호 / 825 ~ 839페이지
· 저자명 : 이용수, 김용래

초록

This study was intended to analyze data on technical and strategical game analysis of the Korea national football athletes by position and by 15-minute unit found at the 2018 2nd Russian World Cup qualifier and at the final qualifier. For this purpose, it adopted data on the game analysis of national football athletes playing at 14 football games of the 2018 2nd Russian World Cup qualifier and the final qualifier. For data collection, it employed game reports Provided by Instat, the game analysis company and selectively used only 52 factors used by position and by 15-minute unit. The collected data were statistically processed by SPSS 18.0. It employed Cronbach’α for the purpose of reliability testing and conducted One-Way ANOVA to test the extracted factors by position and by 15-minute unit. And it employed LSD as the method of posteriori tests and set the level of significance at α=.05. As a result the following findings were obtained: First, comparison of data on technical and strategical game analysis of the Korean national football athletes by position showed that there was a significant difference in the followings: movenent movement(p=.000); success in movement(p=.000); defense movement(p=.000); success in defense movement(p=.000); offense movement(p=.000); success in offense movement(p=.000); attempts at lost balls and regained balls(p=.030); success in attempts at lost balls and regained balls(p=.001); success in attempts at balls in air(p=.001); attempts at offense(p=.000); success in offense attempts(p=.003); defense attempts(p=.000); success in defense attempts(p=.000); pass(p=.000), pass accuracy(p=.000); non-offense pass(p=.000); non-offense pass accuracy(p=.000); offense pass(p=.000); offense pass accuracy(p=.000); short-distance pass(p=.000); short-distance pass accuracy(p=.000); mid-distance pass(p=.000); and middistance pass accuracy(p=.000). But it was found that there was not a significant difference in attempts at balls in air.
Second, comparison of data on technical and strategical game analysis of the Korean national soccer athletes by 15-minute unit showed that there was a significant difference in the followings: frequency of lost balls(p=.012); frequency of offence(p=.045); percentage of success in movement (p=.013); pass accuracy %(p=.000); frequency of challenges(p=.003); frequency of success in challenges(p=.047). But it was found that there was not a significant difference in the followings: degree of ball occupation (second); rate of ball occupation; lost balls in the Korean team camp; lost balls in the Korean team camp; balls regained from the other team; balls regained from the other team camp; counterattack; during set piece attack; shooting; effective shooting; fouls; fouls in the Korean team camp; movement; success; pass; pass accuracy; pass accuracy %; challenge success; challenge success %; dribble; dribble success; tackle; tackle success; intercept; and intercept in the other team camp.

영어초록

This study was intended to analyze data on technical and strategical game analysis of the Korea national football athletes by position and by 15-minute unit found at the 2018 2nd Russian World Cup qualifier and at the final qualifier. For this purpose, it adopted data on the game analysis of national football athletes playing at 14 football games of the 2018 2nd Russian World Cup qualifier and the final qualifier. For data collection, it employed game reports Provided by Instat, the game analysis company and selectively used only 52 factors used by position and by 15-minute unit. The collected data were statistically processed by SPSS 18.0. It employed Cronbach’α for the purpose of reliability testing and conducted One-Way ANOVA to test the extracted factors by position and by 15-minute unit. And it employed LSD as the method of posteriori tests and set the level of significance at α=.05. As a result the following findings were obtained: First, comparison of data on technical and strategical game analysis of the Korean national football athletes by position showed that there was a significant difference in the followings: movenent movement(p=.000); success in movement(p=.000); defense movement(p=.000); success in defense movement(p=.000); offense movement(p=.000); success in offense movement(p=.000); attempts at lost balls and regained balls(p=.030); success in attempts at lost balls and regained balls(p=.001); success in attempts at balls in air(p=.001); attempts at offense(p=.000); success in offense attempts(p=.003); defense attempts(p=.000); success in defense attempts(p=.000); pass(p=.000), pass accuracy(p=.000); non-offense pass(p=.000); non-offense pass accuracy(p=.000); offense pass(p=.000); offense pass accuracy(p=.000); short-distance pass(p=.000); short-distance pass accuracy(p=.000); mid-distance pass(p=.000); and middistance pass accuracy(p=.000). But it was found that there was not a significant difference in attempts at balls in air.
Second, comparison of data on technical and strategical game analysis of the Korean national soccer athletes by 15-minute unit showed that there was a significant difference in the followings: frequency of lost balls(p=.012); frequency of offence(p=.045); percentage of success in movement (p=.013); pass accuracy %(p=.000); frequency of challenges(p=.003); frequency of success in challenges(p=.047). But it was found that there was not a significant difference in the followings: degree of ball occupation (second); rate of ball occupation; lost balls in the Korean team camp; lost balls in the Korean team camp; balls regained from the other team; balls regained from the other team camp; counterattack; during set piece attack; shooting; effective shooting; fouls; fouls in the Korean team camp; movement; success; pass; pass accuracy; pass accuracy %; challenge success; challenge success %; dribble; dribble success; tackle; tackle success; intercept; and intercept in the other team camp.

참고자료

· 없음