• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
  • AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

조선시대 소송제도와 外知部의 활동 (The Trial System of Joseon, and Activities of the Weji-bu(外知部) entities)

31 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.05.13 최종저작일 2016.10
31P 미리보기
조선시대 소송제도와 外知部의 활동
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 명청사학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 명청사연구 / 46호 / 107 ~ 137페이지
    · 저자명 : 심재우

    초록

    Attempted in this article is to determine the characteristics and defining qualities of the Joseon era trial system, in terms of its differences from its Chinese counterpart as well as some similarities with it. First discussed here are various aspects of Joseon trials, and also the apparent nature of the trial system itself. Subsequently examined is the Weji-bu(外知部) entities, who served as trial experts and also representatives in court.
    The point raised in this article is that a years-old notion which had believed that Korean people in the past had a rather conservative mind-set which tried to avoid trials at all cost could not be farther from the truth and therefore is nothing but a misconception. In the Joseon period legal fights and lawsuits which intended to protect civil rights and properties took place rather frequently in local regions. We can see that from not only the trial system itself of the time but also various records including 『Minjang Chibu-chaek(民狀置簿冊)』, which was a compilation of civil appeals(訴狀) submitted to local prefects with the intention to launch lawsuits. This article strongly argues that such trend of actually ‘favoring lawsuits(好訟)' could be attributed to the open atmosphere of the Joseon society that did not see such actions as a vice at all, and also the Joseon system that allowed civilians to launch lawsuits relatively freely.
    Also examined here, alongside characteristics of the Joseon trial system, is the role that was played by the Weji-bu(外知部) entities, who were virtually ‘representatives in court.’ Examination of their actions shows us that the service of these entities had been required even since the early days of the dynasty. They involved themselves in the proceedings of the case, and represented the interests of their clients in the court. Some of them even served in the capacity of scriveners(代書人) or lawyers which we can see today, as they were well versed in legal codes and were also armed with necessary information usually involved in court actions.
    The Joseon government was not fond of their activities, as it was the government’s general view that these Weji-bu entities were inciting legal fights and were practicing law in an illegal fashion. They usually punished them heavily, even in the latter half of the dynasty. As a result, just like the Songsa(訟師: Lawsuit consultants) entities who operated during the Ming anc Qing periods, Weji-bu entitles had to go beyond legal boundaries and covertly operate. Although the modern adversarial system based upon lawyers’ service in court was only established after the Gabo-year reforms, it is clear that the Weji-bu tradition of Joseon served as a platform for such a new establishment of a modern legal system.

    영어초록

    Attempted in this article is to determine the characteristics and defining qualities of the Joseon era trial system, in terms of its differences from its Chinese counterpart as well as some similarities with it. First discussed here are various aspects of Joseon trials, and also the apparent nature of the trial system itself. Subsequently examined is the Weji-bu(外知部) entities, who served as trial experts and also representatives in court.
    The point raised in this article is that a years-old notion which had believed that Korean people in the past had a rather conservative mind-set which tried to avoid trials at all cost could not be farther from the truth and therefore is nothing but a misconception. In the Joseon period legal fights and lawsuits which intended to protect civil rights and properties took place rather frequently in local regions. We can see that from not only the trial system itself of the time but also various records including 『Minjang Chibu-chaek(民狀置簿冊)』, which was a compilation of civil appeals(訴狀) submitted to local prefects with the intention to launch lawsuits. This article strongly argues that such trend of actually ‘favoring lawsuits(好訟)' could be attributed to the open atmosphere of the Joseon society that did not see such actions as a vice at all, and also the Joseon system that allowed civilians to launch lawsuits relatively freely.
    Also examined here, alongside characteristics of the Joseon trial system, is the role that was played by the Weji-bu(外知部) entities, who were virtually ‘representatives in court.’ Examination of their actions shows us that the service of these entities had been required even since the early days of the dynasty. They involved themselves in the proceedings of the case, and represented the interests of their clients in the court. Some of them even served in the capacity of scriveners(代書人) or lawyers which we can see today, as they were well versed in legal codes and were also armed with necessary information usually involved in court actions.
    The Joseon government was not fond of their activities, as it was the government’s general view that these Weji-bu entities were inciting legal fights and were practicing law in an illegal fashion. They usually punished them heavily, even in the latter half of the dynasty. As a result, just like the Songsa(訟師: Lawsuit consultants) entities who operated during the Ming anc Qing periods, Weji-bu entitles had to go beyond legal boundaries and covertly operate. Although the modern adversarial system based upon lawyers’ service in court was only established after the Gabo-year reforms, it is clear that the Weji-bu tradition of Joseon served as a platform for such a new establishment of a modern legal system.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
  • EasyAI 무료체험
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 10월 15일 수요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
2:20 오전