地の文での状態表現のテンス形式の使用様相 ―明治期と戦後の3人称小説を対象として― (Usage of Tense Forms for Stative Expressions in Narrative Discourse ―Focusing on Third-person Novels from the Meiji and Post-war Period―)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국일본어교육학회
· 수록지 정보 : 日本語敎育 / 109권 / 89 ~ 107페이지
· 저자명 : 이경민

초록

本稿は、明治期と戦後の小説作品（各10作品）を取り上げ、地の文に表れる状態表現のテンス形式を考察した。考察の結果としては、まず、明治期小説の地の文では、戦後小説に比べて現在形テイルによる状態表現が多いことが確認できた。一方、戦後小説の地の文では、過去形テイタによる状態表現が遥かに多い比率を示している。
具体的には、明治期（特に初期言文一致期）では、話し手の視点にせよ登場人物の視点にせよ現在形を用いて観察される状態をそのまま描写することが主流であった。それに対し、戦後小説では、語り方の手法が比較的に固定化されて、語り手の視点から語られる状態表現には物語の主導時制である過去形テイタの出現が極めて著しい。
まとめると、近代書き言葉の成立と伴い、語り方において登場人物の視点ということを意識するようになって、全ての地の文の状態表現が過去形テイタにはなっていないが、戦後に至っては地の文の中での現在形テイルの使い方が限られてきたことが明らかになった。

영어초록

This paper examines the tense forms of stative expressions that appear in texts from the Meiji period and the postwar period. As a result of the analysis, first, it was confirmed that in Meiji period novels, there are more expressions of state in the present tense teiru than in postwar novels. On the other hand, in post-war novels written on narrative discourse, there is a far greater proportion of state expressions using the past tense teita.
Specifically, during the Meiji period (particularly during the early period of unification of the written and spoken forms of a language), it was common to use the present tense to describe the observed state as it was, whether from the speaker's perspective or the character's perspective. In contrast, in postwar novels, the method of storytelling is relatively fixed, and the past tense teita, which is the leading tense of the story, appears prominently in the expression of the state told from the narrator's perspective.
In summary, with the establishment of modern written language, we became conscious of the character's point of view in the way we spoke, and although the state expressions of all local sentences did not become past tense teita, after the war, It has become clear that the use of the present tense teiru in sentences of the narrative discourse has become limited.

참고자료

· 없음