• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

明, 淸代시각문화를 통해 본 諸葛亮圖像의 전개와 성격 변모 (Zhu Ge Liang Iconography in China: Development and Change in Ming and Qing Visual Culture)

31 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.04.30 최종저작일 2010.12
31P 미리보기
明, 淸代시각문화를 통해 본 諸葛亮圖像의 전개와 성격 변모
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 국립중앙박물관
    · 수록지 정보 : 미술자료 / 79호 / 113 ~ 143페이지
    · 저자명 : 장준구

    초록

    The previous studies on Zhu Ge Liang mainly focused on historical and literature researches on the man himself with no artistic researches on his icons. Investigating his icons and their development will claim some significance since it has never been conducted before. In addition, it will play a critical role in understanding the relations between literature and art and further politics and art and ideology and art. Such an effort is one of the tasks that should be fulfilled to understand the icons of Zhu Ge Liang during Chosun.
    Zhu Ge Liang was an eminent politician and strategist during the Three Kingdoms Period. People started to worship him right after his death and continued to do so for generations. In the beginning, his worship was not much different from worship of saints or heroes. There were only a couple of cases in which his icons were created until Northern Song Dynasty. Entering the era of Southern Song Dynasty, however, his worship grew intensively strong and creation of his icons went in full scale. Those developments were closely correlated to “Shu-Han Legitimacy” argued by Zhuxi (1130-1200).
    During Southern Song Dynasty, when the people were under the pressure of northern races, Zhuxi argued in his book Tongjian gangmu (通鑑綱目) that Shu was the legitimate successor of Han and thus raised a just and great cause for the people unlike those scholars of Northern Song Dynasty who saw Wei as the legitimate successor of Han. Since Zhuxi, the heritage of “Shu-Han Legitimacy” naturally led to the worship of Liu Bei (151-223), the monarch of Shu-Han, and Zhu Ge Liang, the “practical leader” of Shu-han. The icons of Zhu Ge Liang were also closely related to those ideologies of the times. Zhu Ge Liang received much admiration while he was still alive and continuous worship after his death. His worship became full-blown after Zhuxi proposed “Shu-Han Legitimacy” during Southern Song Dynasty.
    It was difficult to come across the icons of Zhu Ge Liang before Southern Song Dynasty. After Zhuxi’s “Shu-Han Legitimacy,” however, they increased in numbers. His icons remained in small numbers until Ming Dynasty. The r ecords show that his characteristic icons were not established yet.
    During Ming Dynasty, his icons were mainly created at the royal court to serve Confucian or political purposes with a focus on his sides as a “loyal servant.” The painting practice at the royal court went down the spiral after middle Ming Dynasty as the eunuchs gained the power. Thus the creation of his icons ended at the royal court and moved to literary painters, who renewed their perceptions of his icons and translated them into their paintings. It was at that time that the biggest characteristic of his icons called Yu Shan (羽扇), Lun Jin (輪巾) was established.
    During Qing Dynasty, the Han Dynasty was replaced by the Manchurian one, which accordingly changed the nature of his icons. When the previous dynasty was replaced by the next one in early Qing Dynasty, his icons became the means for the migrants to project their awareness or self-consciousness into. The Qing Dynasty set up by the Manchurians no longer worshiped Zhu Ge Liang, a Han hero, and created his icons. The creation of his icons continued among common people.

    영어초록

    The previous studies on Zhu Ge Liang mainly focused on historical and literature researches on the man himself with no artistic researches on his icons. Investigating his icons and their development will claim some significance since it has never been conducted before. In addition, it will play a critical role in understanding the relations between literature and art and further politics and art and ideology and art. Such an effort is one of the tasks that should be fulfilled to understand the icons of Zhu Ge Liang during Chosun.
    Zhu Ge Liang was an eminent politician and strategist during the Three Kingdoms Period. People started to worship him right after his death and continued to do so for generations. In the beginning, his worship was not much different from worship of saints or heroes. There were only a couple of cases in which his icons were created until Northern Song Dynasty. Entering the era of Southern Song Dynasty, however, his worship grew intensively strong and creation of his icons went in full scale. Those developments were closely correlated to “Shu-Han Legitimacy” argued by Zhuxi (1130-1200).
    During Southern Song Dynasty, when the people were under the pressure of northern races, Zhuxi argued in his book Tongjian gangmu (通鑑綱目) that Shu was the legitimate successor of Han and thus raised a just and great cause for the people unlike those scholars of Northern Song Dynasty who saw Wei as the legitimate successor of Han. Since Zhuxi, the heritage of “Shu-Han Legitimacy” naturally led to the worship of Liu Bei (151-223), the monarch of Shu-Han, and Zhu Ge Liang, the “practical leader” of Shu-han. The icons of Zhu Ge Liang were also closely related to those ideologies of the times. Zhu Ge Liang received much admiration while he was still alive and continuous worship after his death. His worship became full-blown after Zhuxi proposed “Shu-Han Legitimacy” during Southern Song Dynasty.
    It was difficult to come across the icons of Zhu Ge Liang before Southern Song Dynasty. After Zhuxi’s “Shu-Han Legitimacy,” however, they increased in numbers. His icons remained in small numbers until Ming Dynasty. The r ecords show that his characteristic icons were not established yet.
    During Ming Dynasty, his icons were mainly created at the royal court to serve Confucian or political purposes with a focus on his sides as a “loyal servant.” The painting practice at the royal court went down the spiral after middle Ming Dynasty as the eunuchs gained the power. Thus the creation of his icons ended at the royal court and moved to literary painters, who renewed their perceptions of his icons and translated them into their paintings. It was at that time that the biggest characteristic of his icons called Yu Shan (羽扇), Lun Jin (輪巾) was established.
    During Qing Dynasty, the Han Dynasty was replaced by the Manchurian one, which accordingly changed the nature of his icons. When the previous dynasty was replaced by the next one in early Qing Dynasty, his icons became the means for the migrants to project their awareness or self-consciousness into. The Qing Dynasty set up by the Manchurians no longer worshiped Zhu Ge Liang, a Han hero, and created his icons. The creation of his icons continued among common people.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2026년 03월 03일 화요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
11:34 오전