• 전문가 요청 쿠폰 이벤트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

여말선초 명(明)의 예제(禮制)와 지방 성황제(城隍祭) 재편 (Rearrangement of the local Seonghwang-je/城隍祭 services during the transitional period between Goryeo and Joseon dynasties, and the ritual protocols of the Chinese Ming/明 dynasty)

45 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.04.30 최종저작일 2009.06
45P 미리보기
여말선초 명(明)의 예제(禮制)와 지방 성황제(城隍祭) 재편
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 한국역사연구회
    · 수록지 정보 : 역사와 현실 / 72호 / 207 ~ 251페이지
    · 저자명 : 최종석

    초록

    The modifications made to the Seonghwang-je services during the transitional period between Goryeo and Joseon dynasties, were arranged out of a strong denial(negation) of the existing community-wide Seonghwang-je practices that had been led by the local influentials(Hyangri) and conducted as an official function. Such modification opted to establish the Ming dynasty's local Seonghwang protocols(which were developed by the founder of the Ming dynasty and were new ones even in China as well) as the legitimate and main protocols(正祀) for the Seonghwang-je practice in Joseon. This task of modification began in 1392, the first year of king Taejo’s reign, and continued during the early days of the Joseon dynasty, motivated by considerable changes in environment that involved the Seonghwang-je practice and took place during the ending days of the Goryeo dynasty.
    In July 1370(19th year of king Gongmin-wang's reign), Ming's imperial edict was sent to the Goryeo government. This edict was originally issued earlier in June the same year, and contained Ming government's order (for the Goryeo dynasty) to get rid of the existing practice of bestowing titles(封號), and the renaming of various entities, like natural geographic figures(mountains and streams) and the Seonghwang figures(嶽鎭海凟城隍諸神). Regarding the local Seonghwang figures' titles, it was ordered only to name them with administratively discerning titles and with no other bestowed titles whatsoever. Due to this new protocol, special occasions in which certain Seonghwang figures from several regions which were acknowledged with their own miraculous qualities were exceptionally given with official titles and registered in the memorial service roster(祀典), ceased to exist. And the dynastic service roster came to show no local Seonghwang figures registered.
    This renaming of the Seonghwang figures was an attempt of negating and dismantling the existing mentality toward Seonghwang figures and the religious customs that involved them. Ming dynasty was strongly urging Goryeo to do so, and the reason that Ming tried to bring modifications to even the Goryeo dynasty's memorial services for the mountains and streams, was because it developed a new kind of perception toward the natural figures not only in China but also inside adjacent subordinate states(藩屬國). Ming considered the mountains and streams in countries that pledged loyalty as a vassal(臣附) to China, as entities the very same with China's own mountains and streams. In other words, Ming considered them all objects of memorial services that should be held, carried and overseen by the emperor himself. This perception was indeed a new one, and was essentially extending the ceremonial and ritual protocols of the master country(천자국) to the vassal states, opening a new chapter in the sino-centered traditional order. Ming dynasty's order to Goryeo to change its own internal practices and protocols was to urge the Goryeo people to observe and abide by this universal cause, and relevant course of actions.
    Yet, on the other hand, apparently Goryeo as a whole was not that acceptive to this kind of urging. The environment was not so welcoming to such demand. The order itself, and the Neo-Confucian nuances and aspiration embedded inside that order should have been warmly considered by the newcomer Goryeo scholar-officials of the time(both philosophically and epistemologically). Those Goryeo scholar-officials must have perceived Ming's order not as a threatening display of force but as a suggestion of a course of action based upon universal order and ritual protocols. Yet, there is no concrete reference to Goryeo people's acceptance and compliance to such order, and it seems that was because of the ever changing political landscape of the Goryeo dynasty at the time, which was witnessing the assassination of king Gongmin-wang and the killing of a Ming emissary that ensued, events that must have made it difficult for the scholar-officials to act upon their own ideals.
    In order for the acception of Ming dynasty’s ritual protocols that involved the local Seonghwang-je practice to go forward, a new momentum was needed, and the political changes that were brought about by Yi Seong Gyae's troops' return from Wihwa-do, the foundation of the new dynasty and subsequent changes that occurred inside the political arena, provided such needed momentum. In August the first year of king Taejo's reign, right after the dynasty's foundation, Jo Bak and others proposed that the overall Seonghwang ritual protocols should be modified based upon the Hongmu ritual protocols. Such proposal was accepted and began to be implemented. In other words, the Seonghwang-je practice started to be modified since fairly early on in Joseon's history. This embracement and implementation of a new ‘official’ Seonghwang-je system based upon the Ming protocols, was a discontinuation of the Goryeo dynasty's Seonghwang-je practice, a denial of the existing customs and protocols developed in the local areas, an acception of totally different and alien protocols, an embracement of a new perspective toward the mountains and streams(including the Seonghwang figures) that was newly perpetuated by the Ming dynasty, and a total reworking of the past order and mentality, sponsored by no other than the dynastic government itself. This task of modification, was proceeding upon the Joseon leadership's discourse of aiming for a universal (sino-centered) order, and also upon an effort of reaching that status by accepting and embracing the 'Institutions of the Time(時王之制)’. Because of this specific nature of the Seonghwang-je practice modification, new official services were being held since king Taejo’s first year, yet some of the elements that directly collided and clashed with previous customs and perspectives were not that well observed, not to mention performed. Placing names and tablets were such examples, and supplemental orders continued to be issued during the reigns of kings Taejong and Sejong, until the 19th year of the latter king's reign.
    The task that accompanied the aforementioned Seonghwang-je modification, was the task of removing some of the local Seonghwang figures that were earlier registered in the dynastic roster of service from the roster, and reestablish them in a unilateral order of local Seonghwang figures. King Taejo already listened to such suggestions, but it was in the 9th year of king Taejong's reign that such suggestions were actually implemented. As a result, most of the local Seonghwang figures that had been registered upon the roster since the Goryeo dynasty period were all excluded from the roster, and became objects not of dynastic services(國祭) but of services held by the officials in charge of the region the Seonghwang figures were located in. Yet, even after this, some of the Seonghwang figures that had connections to founder king Taejo continued to be served as objects of dynastic services, and the task of rearranging them in a monotonous fashion was naturally delayed, until the reign of king Seongjong. Seongjong's era is what seems to have been the turning point for a new era that no longer required dynastic intervention to ensure the new Seonghwang order.
    In the meantime, bringing a new order to the existing Seonghwang customs even in terms of the format of the structures and the location of sites(altars), started during the reign of Sejong as well. But instances in which the existing Seonghwang-sa altars were dismantled and new ones established in different locations(‘廢祠設壇’) only occurred very scarcely during the early half of the Joseon period. Such process accelerated only in the latter half of the dynasty. This shows that the new order involving the structure and location of the Seonghwang figures only started to change in the later days of the dynasty, unlike the Seonghwang-je order itself.

    영어초록

    The modifications made to the Seonghwang-je services during the transitional period between Goryeo and Joseon dynasties, were arranged out of a strong denial(negation) of the existing community-wide Seonghwang-je practices that had been led by the local influentials(Hyangri) and conducted as an official function. Such modification opted to establish the Ming dynasty's local Seonghwang protocols(which were developed by the founder of the Ming dynasty and were new ones even in China as well) as the legitimate and main protocols(正祀) for the Seonghwang-je practice in Joseon. This task of modification began in 1392, the first year of king Taejo’s reign, and continued during the early days of the Joseon dynasty, motivated by considerable changes in environment that involved the Seonghwang-je practice and took place during the ending days of the Goryeo dynasty.
    In July 1370(19th year of king Gongmin-wang's reign), Ming's imperial edict was sent to the Goryeo government. This edict was originally issued earlier in June the same year, and contained Ming government's order (for the Goryeo dynasty) to get rid of the existing practice of bestowing titles(封號), and the renaming of various entities, like natural geographic figures(mountains and streams) and the Seonghwang figures(嶽鎭海凟城隍諸神). Regarding the local Seonghwang figures' titles, it was ordered only to name them with administratively discerning titles and with no other bestowed titles whatsoever. Due to this new protocol, special occasions in which certain Seonghwang figures from several regions which were acknowledged with their own miraculous qualities were exceptionally given with official titles and registered in the memorial service roster(祀典), ceased to exist. And the dynastic service roster came to show no local Seonghwang figures registered.
    This renaming of the Seonghwang figures was an attempt of negating and dismantling the existing mentality toward Seonghwang figures and the religious customs that involved them. Ming dynasty was strongly urging Goryeo to do so, and the reason that Ming tried to bring modifications to even the Goryeo dynasty's memorial services for the mountains and streams, was because it developed a new kind of perception toward the natural figures not only in China but also inside adjacent subordinate states(藩屬國). Ming considered the mountains and streams in countries that pledged loyalty as a vassal(臣附) to China, as entities the very same with China's own mountains and streams. In other words, Ming considered them all objects of memorial services that should be held, carried and overseen by the emperor himself. This perception was indeed a new one, and was essentially extending the ceremonial and ritual protocols of the master country(천자국) to the vassal states, opening a new chapter in the sino-centered traditional order. Ming dynasty's order to Goryeo to change its own internal practices and protocols was to urge the Goryeo people to observe and abide by this universal cause, and relevant course of actions.
    Yet, on the other hand, apparently Goryeo as a whole was not that acceptive to this kind of urging. The environment was not so welcoming to such demand. The order itself, and the Neo-Confucian nuances and aspiration embedded inside that order should have been warmly considered by the newcomer Goryeo scholar-officials of the time(both philosophically and epistemologically). Those Goryeo scholar-officials must have perceived Ming's order not as a threatening display of force but as a suggestion of a course of action based upon universal order and ritual protocols. Yet, there is no concrete reference to Goryeo people's acceptance and compliance to such order, and it seems that was because of the ever changing political landscape of the Goryeo dynasty at the time, which was witnessing the assassination of king Gongmin-wang and the killing of a Ming emissary that ensued, events that must have made it difficult for the scholar-officials to act upon their own ideals.
    In order for the acception of Ming dynasty’s ritual protocols that involved the local Seonghwang-je practice to go forward, a new momentum was needed, and the political changes that were brought about by Yi Seong Gyae's troops' return from Wihwa-do, the foundation of the new dynasty and subsequent changes that occurred inside the political arena, provided such needed momentum. In August the first year of king Taejo's reign, right after the dynasty's foundation, Jo Bak and others proposed that the overall Seonghwang ritual protocols should be modified based upon the Hongmu ritual protocols. Such proposal was accepted and began to be implemented. In other words, the Seonghwang-je practice started to be modified since fairly early on in Joseon's history. This embracement and implementation of a new ‘official’ Seonghwang-je system based upon the Ming protocols, was a discontinuation of the Goryeo dynasty's Seonghwang-je practice, a denial of the existing customs and protocols developed in the local areas, an acception of totally different and alien protocols, an embracement of a new perspective toward the mountains and streams(including the Seonghwang figures) that was newly perpetuated by the Ming dynasty, and a total reworking of the past order and mentality, sponsored by no other than the dynastic government itself. This task of modification, was proceeding upon the Joseon leadership's discourse of aiming for a universal (sino-centered) order, and also upon an effort of reaching that status by accepting and embracing the 'Institutions of the Time(時王之制)’. Because of this specific nature of the Seonghwang-je practice modification, new official services were being held since king Taejo’s first year, yet some of the elements that directly collided and clashed with previous customs and perspectives were not that well observed, not to mention performed. Placing names and tablets were such examples, and supplemental orders continued to be issued during the reigns of kings Taejong and Sejong, until the 19th year of the latter king's reign.
    The task that accompanied the aforementioned Seonghwang-je modification, was the task of removing some of the local Seonghwang figures that were earlier registered in the dynastic roster of service from the roster, and reestablish them in a unilateral order of local Seonghwang figures. King Taejo already listened to such suggestions, but it was in the 9th year of king Taejong's reign that such suggestions were actually implemented. As a result, most of the local Seonghwang figures that had been registered upon the roster since the Goryeo dynasty period were all excluded from the roster, and became objects not of dynastic services(國祭) but of services held by the officials in charge of the region the Seonghwang figures were located in. Yet, even after this, some of the Seonghwang figures that had connections to founder king Taejo continued to be served as objects of dynastic services, and the task of rearranging them in a monotonous fashion was naturally delayed, until the reign of king Seongjong. Seongjong's era is what seems to have been the turning point for a new era that no longer required dynastic intervention to ensure the new Seonghwang order.
    In the meantime, bringing a new order to the existing Seonghwang customs even in terms of the format of the structures and the location of sites(altars), started during the reign of Sejong as well. But instances in which the existing Seonghwang-sa altars were dismantled and new ones established in different locations(‘廢祠設壇’) only occurred very scarcely during the early half of the Joseon period. Such process accelerated only in the latter half of the dynasty. This shows that the new order involving the structure and location of the Seonghwang figures only started to change in the later days of the dynasty, unlike the Seonghwang-je order itself.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“역사와 현실”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2026년 03월 24일 화요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
2:34 오후