• 전문가 요청 쿠폰 이벤트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

『삼천리』를 통해 본 친일의 논리와 정서 (The logic and mentality behind the Pro-Japanese position, reflected in the magazine)

30 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.04.25 최종저작일 2008.09
30P 미리보기
『삼천리』를 통해 본 친일의 논리와 정서
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 한국역사연구회
    · 수록지 정보 : 역사와 현실 / 69호 / 135 ~ 164페이지
    · 저자명 : 이지원

    초록

    In this article, the logic and mentality that existed behind the pro-Japanese position which prevailed during the 1930s and ‘40s are examined, through the literary works published in the popular magazine 『Samcheon-ri(三千里)』, of which publication was overseen by a pro-Japanese intellectual named Kim Dong Hwan. The pro-Japanese arguments that we can find inside 『Samcheon-ri』display a tone which was significantly enforced and aggressively expressed with the breakout of the war. Added to that, a specific kind of perception of the world, a position supporting modernization, and also a view upon the issue of people(nation), all being products of the modern days of Korea, can be found behind such pro-Japanese arguments. The perception of the world exhibited in 『Samcheon-ri』was based upon Social Darwinism, while the cause of modernization was based upon the idea of Korea’s subordinacy to Japan and also a certain level of ‘Asian-ism’ supporting the idea of ‘cooperations’ between East Asian countries, and the view upon the nation supported the idea of the Korean people and the Korean nation being ‘assimilated’ into Japan.
    From a Social Darwin-ist viewpoint to perceive the world, and from an attitude that supported the concept of ‘subordinate modernization’, Japan’s war was considered as a noble war waged out of a grand vision determined to develop itself to become a stronger state and also a modernly civilized nation. And at the same time, the idea of ‘developing’ Joseon as a supposedly ‘economic partner’ of Japan, was justified and supported as well. Also, the meaningful existence of Joseon was only granted and acknowledged ‘conceptually’ inside the ‘East Asian Cooperative block’ with Japan at its center. Japan had been reshaping Asia since the 19th century, and under such sentiment (of the Japanese people), Koreans were forced to cooperate with the system.
    In the meantime, the argument of ‘the Japanese inland and the Joseon peninsula as one’, which surfaced after the Sino-Japanese war ended, was an argument inherently Fascist in nature, as it supported the idea of forming a ‘Mega-state unbounded by and also transcending Nationalism’, which also imagined Joseon shattering its national boundaries and joining the ‘Japanese state’ inside the ‘East Asian Cooperative block’ as a legitimate part of it. This argument of ‘Japan and Joseon as one’ displayed racism and state-ism merged with each other, and it was also related to the ‘Assimilation argument’, which was the primary position of the Japanese colonial rulers as well.
    With the war heating up, the editors of 『Samcheon-ri』magazine, in their efforts to achieve the objective making ‘Japan and Joseon as one’, encouraged the Korean people to brush up their patriotism and spreaded totalitarian national sentiments throughout the Korean population, through emphasizing the merits of a reactionary spirit honoring militarism(尙武) and propagating the ‘rural qualities’. In the wake of ever elevating wartime mobilization in the 1940s, such efforts manifested themselves in the form of campaigns(“New System Movement”) launched by the Joseon Governor General office, which promoted local artistic activities, agricultural entertainment and the honoring of local traditions. In such campaigns, things that were Joseon and things that were local in nature were promoted to a certain extent, yet such concept of ‘localism’ denoted no other than regional qualities ‘conceptualized’ inside the supposed ‘Great state of Japan’, and as a result, such concept came to generate abundantly colonial nuances. In the end, what was promoted as ‘national(Korean)’, was in fact most anti-national in nature, and anti-Korean in nature as well.

    영어초록

    In this article, the logic and mentality that existed behind the pro-Japanese position which prevailed during the 1930s and ‘40s are examined, through the literary works published in the popular magazine 『Samcheon-ri(三千里)』, of which publication was overseen by a pro-Japanese intellectual named Kim Dong Hwan. The pro-Japanese arguments that we can find inside 『Samcheon-ri』display a tone which was significantly enforced and aggressively expressed with the breakout of the war. Added to that, a specific kind of perception of the world, a position supporting modernization, and also a view upon the issue of people(nation), all being products of the modern days of Korea, can be found behind such pro-Japanese arguments. The perception of the world exhibited in 『Samcheon-ri』was based upon Social Darwinism, while the cause of modernization was based upon the idea of Korea’s subordinacy to Japan and also a certain level of ‘Asian-ism’ supporting the idea of ‘cooperations’ between East Asian countries, and the view upon the nation supported the idea of the Korean people and the Korean nation being ‘assimilated’ into Japan.
    From a Social Darwin-ist viewpoint to perceive the world, and from an attitude that supported the concept of ‘subordinate modernization’, Japan’s war was considered as a noble war waged out of a grand vision determined to develop itself to become a stronger state and also a modernly civilized nation. And at the same time, the idea of ‘developing’ Joseon as a supposedly ‘economic partner’ of Japan, was justified and supported as well. Also, the meaningful existence of Joseon was only granted and acknowledged ‘conceptually’ inside the ‘East Asian Cooperative block’ with Japan at its center. Japan had been reshaping Asia since the 19th century, and under such sentiment (of the Japanese people), Koreans were forced to cooperate with the system.
    In the meantime, the argument of ‘the Japanese inland and the Joseon peninsula as one’, which surfaced after the Sino-Japanese war ended, was an argument inherently Fascist in nature, as it supported the idea of forming a ‘Mega-state unbounded by and also transcending Nationalism’, which also imagined Joseon shattering its national boundaries and joining the ‘Japanese state’ inside the ‘East Asian Cooperative block’ as a legitimate part of it. This argument of ‘Japan and Joseon as one’ displayed racism and state-ism merged with each other, and it was also related to the ‘Assimilation argument’, which was the primary position of the Japanese colonial rulers as well.
    With the war heating up, the editors of 『Samcheon-ri』magazine, in their efforts to achieve the objective making ‘Japan and Joseon as one’, encouraged the Korean people to brush up their patriotism and spreaded totalitarian national sentiments throughout the Korean population, through emphasizing the merits of a reactionary spirit honoring militarism(尙武) and propagating the ‘rural qualities’. In the wake of ever elevating wartime mobilization in the 1940s, such efforts manifested themselves in the form of campaigns(“New System Movement”) launched by the Joseon Governor General office, which promoted local artistic activities, agricultural entertainment and the honoring of local traditions. In such campaigns, things that were Joseon and things that were local in nature were promoted to a certain extent, yet such concept of ‘localism’ denoted no other than regional qualities ‘conceptualized’ inside the supposed ‘Great state of Japan’, and as a result, such concept came to generate abundantly colonial nuances. In the end, what was promoted as ‘national(Korean)’, was in fact most anti-national in nature, and anti-Korean in nature as well.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“역사와 현실”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2026년 03월 29일 일요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
11:58 오전