건축 공간 구성에 있어 부분에 대한 인식과 관계성의 차이 고찰- 르 코르뷔지에, 미스 반 데어 로에, 루이스 칸의 논의와 작업 비교를 중심으로 - (A Study on the Difference in Perception and Relationship of the ‘Parts’ in Architectural Space - Focus on the Comparison of Le Corbusier, Mies van der Rohe and Louis I. Kahn -)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국문화공간건축학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국문화공간건축학회논문집 / 63호 / 133 ~ 140페이지
· 저자명 : 백선경

초록

In today 's ongoing integration problem, the discussion of parts and relationship has already begun from the consciousness of the problem of the breakdown of the relationship caused by the standardization of the 20th century. This study focuses on perception of the part and viewpoint of relationship in the composition of architectural space centered on three representative architects of the 20th century. In the pursuit of synthesis, Le Corbusier structured the systematic binding of the completed parts according to the mechanistic point of view. Mies van der Rohe denied and dissolved the completeness and the wholeness of the part. The only remaining result is a 'process' in which uncertain parts are linked and generated. On the other hand, Louis I. Kahn criticizes the formal completeness of Corbusier and accepts the relationship of Mies, which is the subject of the act. However, in order not to be a continuing relationship, he constructs the part by interpreting it as an surrounded area of sensation, not as function or form.
This paper arranges the part and relationship viewpoint after modernism, and grasps the characteristics that appear in the architectural plan composition accordingly.

영어초록

In today 's ongoing integration problem, the discussion of parts and relationship has already begun from the consciousness of the problem of the breakdown of the relationship caused by the standardization of the 20th century. This study focuses on perception of the part and viewpoint of relationship in the composition of architectural space centered on three representative architects of the 20th century. In the pursuit of synthesis, Le Corbusier structured the systematic binding of the completed parts according to the mechanistic point of view. Mies van der Rohe denied and dissolved the completeness and the wholeness of the part. The only remaining result is a 'process' in which uncertain parts are linked and generated. On the other hand, Louis I. Kahn criticizes the formal completeness of Corbusier and accepts the relationship of Mies, which is the subject of the act. However, in order not to be a continuing relationship, he constructs the part by interpreting it as an surrounded area of sensation, not as function or form.
This paper arranges the part and relationship viewpoint after modernism, and grasps the characteristics that appear in the architectural plan composition accordingly.

참고자료

· 없음