경쟁과 협력의 역사해석:'관계균형론' (History Interpretation of Competition and Cooperation: ‘Relation Balance Theory’)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 명지대학교(서울캠퍼스) 인문과학연구소
· 수록지 정보 : 인문과학연구논총 / 43권 / 1호 / 123 ~ 161페이지
· 저자명 : 김정하

초록

문명교류의 역사는 관계 구도의 성립과 변천을 통한 다인종 글로벌화의 여정이다. 지중해는 이를 포태(胞胎)한 대표적인 사례이다.
교류의 관점은 순환론의 역사철학을 전제한다. 교류의 동력으로서, 관계요인간 차이는 ‘다양성’과 ‘차별’의 복합적인 의미를 가진다. 문명교류의 재해석을 위한 기준은 역사를 관계 구도로 인식하는 것, 관계요인 간 차이에서 변화가 기원한다는 발상, 관계 작용의 상호보완성, 역사 변천을 위한 중재 요인의 개입이다.

영어초록

This paper reinterprets history from the point of view of ‘Civilization Exchange’, and presents the Cyclical Theory of Historical Philosophy and relational balance as a background for this. The perspective of Civilization Exchange is based on the principle of Yin-Yang and Five Elements. According to this, in history we can pay attention to the Cyclical Theory of Time Concept and the various characteristics that accompany it. The historical research on the Civilization Exchange is not limited to an individual analysis of historical subjects, but in particular the structure of the relationship between them and the process of their change in more detail.
The historical interpretation of Civilization Exchange, that is, ‘the Relation Balance Theory’, is a historical research theory based on the following several principles.
First, it regards history as a continuous, organic, and whole flow of the establishment of a relational structure and the factors constituting it.
Second, the action between the factors constituting the relationship structure is based on the differences they perceive relative to each other, and in this case, the differences act on each other in the dimension of diversity and differentiation.
Third, the process in which relation factors influence each other depends on the complementary action of ‘Competition’ and ‘Cooperation’, as it is derived from the contradictory structure of the relationship between them.
Fourth, the changing process of history does not follow the change to a completely new dimension as it occurs between the constituents of it. The meaning of this can also be seen in Hegel's law. C, which appears from Tesi through Anti-tesi, is a hybrid of them. On the other hand, new factors intervene in this process of change. This Mediating Factor provides a driving force for change by intervening in the existing conflicting relationship structure, and plays a role in the new relationship structure in the subsequent exchange process.

참고자료

· 없음