韓非子의 法ㆍ術ㆍ勢治論 (A Study of Han Feizi’s Thought on Law, Artifice, and Power)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국동서비교문학학회
· 수록지 정보 : 동서비교문학저널 / 25호 / 81 ~ 106페이지
· 저자명 : 박노현

초록

The teaching consideration of Han Feizi (韓非子) was originated from one of the main leading factions of Oriental thoughts in ancient China from the Zhou dynasty to the Chao dynasty (770-403 B.C.E.). His point of view was in suitabilities as well as in realities of life at that time. Especially he rearranged the defects of previous philosophers’ ideas. Also many of his practical alternatives were contributed to the valuable worths.
The Zhou dynasty to the Chao dynasty was confronted with each others’ countries to expand their territories At that time all philosophers and scholars tried to solve the problems themselves by the suggestions for governing and guiding for their countries which were political solutions. The philosophers, Confucius (孔子), Mencius (孟子), Xunzi (荀子), Mozi (墨子), Laozi (老子), Zhuangzi (莊子), etc., they had no ethical norms to solve the problems.
Although Han Feizi’s philosophy agreed partly the government and enlightenment over human beings’ natural state, he believed that their philosophy couldn’t be the basic solution against the confused and troubled times. So he insisted that the a new suitable political strategy is to be centered by the law-governed state by political power. Han Feizi criticized Shen Buhai (申不害) who insisted on using only artifices not the application of law and Shang Yang (商鞅) who insisted on using only artifices not the application of law. Therefore he insisted on using jointly the application of artifices and laws. Also he insisted that a state is a monarch’s horse, therefore he could controll by artifice. he believed that if in case of disregarding on the relations of law and artifice and power. As we have examined above, Han Feizi power same time. Also that means that the relation of artifice and power shows unavoidably.
According to the above, Han Feizi regarded courtesy as power and use as law and artifice, And he studied and analyzed Xian Qin’s (先秦) lawful idea. And he reorganized Xian Qin’s works, which was described that monarch’s sovereign power was regarded as important means of law and artifice to execute his state.

영어초록

The teaching consideration of Han Feizi (韓非子) was originated from one of the main leading factions of Oriental thoughts in ancient China from the Zhou dynasty to the Chao dynasty (770-403 B.C.E.). His point of view was in suitabilities as well as in realities of life at that time. Especially he rearranged the defects of previous philosophers’ ideas. Also many of his practical alternatives were contributed to the valuable worths.
The Zhou dynasty to the Chao dynasty was confronted with each others’ countries to expand their territories At that time all philosophers and scholars tried to solve the problems themselves by the suggestions for governing and guiding for their countries which were political solutions. The philosophers, Confucius (孔子), Mencius (孟子), Xunzi (荀子), Mozi (墨子), Laozi (老子), Zhuangzi (莊子), etc., they had no ethical norms to solve the problems.
Although Han Feizi’s philosophy agreed partly the government and enlightenment over human beings’ natural state, he believed that their philosophy couldn’t be the basic solution against the confused and troubled times. So he insisted that the a new suitable political strategy is to be centered by the law-governed state by political power. Han Feizi criticized Shen Buhai (申不害) who insisted on using only artifices not the application of law and Shang Yang (商鞅) who insisted on using only artifices not the application of law. Therefore he insisted on using jointly the application of artifices and laws. Also he insisted that a state is a monarch’s horse, therefore he could controll by artifice. he believed that if in case of disregarding on the relations of law and artifice and power. As we have examined above, Han Feizi power same time. Also that means that the relation of artifice and power shows unavoidably.
According to the above, Han Feizi regarded courtesy as power and use as law and artifice, And he studied and analyzed Xian Qin’s (先秦) lawful idea. And he reorganized Xian Qin’s works, which was described that monarch’s sovereign power was regarded as important means of law and artifice to execute his state.

참고자료

· 없음