『樂書孤存』에서 茶山의 琴․瑟論 (In Akseo gojon(樂書孤存) Dasan's study about Gum(琴)․Seul(瑟) -Comparing with Akhak gwebeom(樂學軌範)-)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 민족음악학회
· 수록지 정보 : 음악과 현실 / 38호 / 279 ~ 317페이지
· 저자명 : 권태욱

초록

We could compress the nuclear of Akseo gojon(樂書孤存) which Dasan(茶山) claims into three points. Most of all, Dasan thinks the Gum(琴), and Seul(瑟) are the most significant Court instruments. In addition, at the moment when Dasan lived, Gum and Seul were wrong at form and variety with the original. At third, Dasan indicates detailed name, and measure for right handing down of Gum․Seul. These three points are the nuclear of 10-volumes of Akseo gojon. At first, I studied various historical materials in Chinese ancient literatures and Joseon wangjo sillok(朝鮮王朝實錄) to confirm the musical value of Gum․Seul which was thought to be important by Dasan. At the result, I confirmed that Gum․Seul was not just a music instrument, but it was a important device related with character. Meanwhile, it was known as instrument of Deung-ga(登歌) used in memorial ceremony, but I confirmed that it was actually used in Heon-ga(軒架) in Joseon(朝鮮) Sejong(世宗), also used in Court morning assembly, and even at Court banquet. And, I could also confirmed that it was a common instrument even organized as plural 6 of Gum․Seul until early Joseon. At second, Dasan thought there were various Gum․Seul, not one kind of Gum․Seul like present. So, eventually he pointed out that the Course of handing out. In Coinsidence, the problem of Akseo gojon Gum․Seul that Dasan pointed out was also recorded in Akhak gwebeom, so I set Akhak gwebeom to comparative object in this research. Related to Gum․Seul, the most often quoted Chinese literature in Akhak gwebeom is Jinyang`s Akseo(樂書),
I enforced a literature examination about original text, that is, was the content of Akhak gwebeom well-quoted from Akseo. At the result, I could confirm that Gum․Seul of Akhak gwebeom was quite quoted differently comparing with the original of Akseo. In addition, I demonstrated that the nuclear of Gum․Seul which Dasan pointed out Ain Akseo gojon had objective validity. Finally, Dasan indicated Hwangjong Daegum(黃鐘大琴), Eungjong Daegum(應鐘大琴), Hwangjong Daeseul(黃鐘大瑟), and Eungjong Daeseul(應鐘大瑟)'s structure and size as an example, I introduced it, as it had future-oriented intention of Dasan for right production of Gum․Seul, and I judged that this part needs more deep researches. Through this study, I bring up necessary of verification course about national classic music instruments based on present Akhak gwebeom, and I expect this research to be helped for unforded organizations and haning down of national instruments for future.

영어초록

We could compress the nuclear of Akseo gojon(樂書孤存) which Dasan(茶山) claims into three points. Most of all, Dasan thinks the Gum(琴), and Seul(瑟) are the most significant Court instruments. In addition, at the moment when Dasan lived, Gum and Seul were wrong at form and variety with the original. At third, Dasan indicates detailed name, and measure for right handing down of Gum․Seul. These three points are the nuclear of 10-volumes of Akseo gojon. At first, I studied various historical materials in Chinese ancient literatures and Joseon wangjo sillok(朝鮮王朝實錄) to confirm the musical value of Gum․Seul which was thought to be important by Dasan. At the result, I confirmed that Gum․Seul was not just a music instrument, but it was a important device related with character. Meanwhile, it was known as instrument of Deung-ga(登歌) used in memorial ceremony, but I confirmed that it was actually used in Heon-ga(軒架) in Joseon(朝鮮) Sejong(世宗), also used in Court morning assembly, and even at Court banquet. And, I could also confirmed that it was a common instrument even organized as plural 6 of Gum․Seul until early Joseon. At second, Dasan thought there were various Gum․Seul, not one kind of Gum․Seul like present. So, eventually he pointed out that the Course of handing out. In Coinsidence, the problem of Akseo gojon Gum․Seul that Dasan pointed out was also recorded in Akhak gwebeom, so I set Akhak gwebeom to comparative object in this research. Related to Gum․Seul, the most often quoted Chinese literature in Akhak gwebeom is Jinyang`s Akseo(樂書),
I enforced a literature examination about original text, that is, was the content of Akhak gwebeom well-quoted from Akseo. At the result, I could confirm that Gum․Seul of Akhak gwebeom was quite quoted differently comparing with the original of Akseo. In addition, I demonstrated that the nuclear of Gum․Seul which Dasan pointed out Ain Akseo gojon had objective validity. Finally, Dasan indicated Hwangjong Daegum(黃鐘大琴), Eungjong Daegum(應鐘大琴), Hwangjong Daeseul(黃鐘大瑟), and Eungjong Daeseul(應鐘大瑟)'s structure and size as an example, I introduced it, as it had future-oriented intention of Dasan for right production of Gum․Seul, and I judged that this part needs more deep researches. Through this study, I bring up necessary of verification course about national classic music instruments based on present Akhak gwebeom, and I expect this research to be helped for unforded organizations and haning down of national instruments for future.

참고자료

· 없음