• 전문가 요청 쿠폰 이벤트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

非禮와 尊王의 사이에서: 조선 성종~명종 대 詔勅合迎과 迎勅 시 乘輦의 성취와 그 의미 (The Fulfillment of Greeting Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書) at once and Riding a Palanquin in Greeting Chikseo(勅書) in the King Sŏngjong to Myeongjong period, and Its Meaning)

50 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.04.20 최종저작일 2023.06
50P 미리보기
非禮와 尊王의 사이에서: 조선 성종~명종 대 詔勅合迎과 迎勅 시 乘輦의 성취와 그 의미
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 서울대학교 규장각한국학연구원
    · 수록지 정보 : 한국문화 / 102호 / 145 ~ 194페이지
    · 저자명 : 최종석

    초록

    I has reviewed the conflicts between Chosŏn and Ming Dynasty envoys over some of the rituals greeting Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書), as part of figuring out what kind of mentality Chosŏn performed diplomatic rites in the process of dealing with Ming Dynasty(Emperor). In previous studies, conflicts between Chosŏn and Ming envoys over some of the rituals have been regarded as a power game between the two countries, but such an approach did not fit the context of the times. In other words, both Chosŏn and Ming Dynasty envoys had a consensus to realize ‘correct’ Li(禮), but for some procedures where ‘correct’ Li(禮) practiced clearly did not exist, each insisted that their practice conformed to Li(禮). As a result, these conflicts arose.
    From this point of view, I investigated that after the acceptance of the method of separately greeting Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書) in the reign of King Sŏngjong(the king riding a horse when greeting Chikseo related to this), Chosŏn overturned this acceptance and then the king rode a palanquin to greet both Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書) at once, and even the procedure of riding in a palanquin was finally realized even when greeting Chikseo(勅書). Specifically, the process by which the king rode a palanquin to greet both Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書) at once, and the achievement of riding the palanquin even when greeting Chikseo(勅書) and how this achievement was achieved was reviewed, and I tried to identify the historical context and meaning of this process. In particular, I examined the context in which unusually, the Chosŏn government went so far as to break ritual rules and implemented the practice of having the king ride on a palanquin instead of a horse when greeting Chikseo(勅書), and the context in which it also justified riding a palanquin when the Chosŏn government was greeting a Chikseo(勅書).
    Previous studies have assumed that a deepening and transformation of Sadae(事大) consciousness toward Ming at some point in time, and have used Chosŏn’s acceptance of Ming Dynasty envoys’ claims as an indicator of the deepening and transformation of Sadae(事大) consciousness toward Ming, focusing on the action of Chosŏn’s acceptance of Ming Dynasty envoys’ claims and attributing significance to it as a trigger for the deepening and transformation of Sadae(事大) consciousness toward Ming. However, this paper, which also examined the post-acceptance of aspect of Ming Dynasty envoys’ claims, suggests that Chosŏn’s choice and will were decisive in the outcome of the conflict between Chosŏn and Ming envoys. It should not be judged as an opportunity to deepen and transform the Sadae(事大) consciousness toward Ming.

    영어초록

    I has reviewed the conflicts between Chosŏn and Ming Dynasty envoys over some of the rituals greeting Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書), as part of figuring out what kind of mentality Chosŏn performed diplomatic rites in the process of dealing with Ming Dynasty(Emperor). In previous studies, conflicts between Chosŏn and Ming envoys over some of the rituals have been regarded as a power game between the two countries, but such an approach did not fit the context of the times. In other words, both Chosŏn and Ming Dynasty envoys had a consensus to realize ‘correct’ Li(禮), but for some procedures where ‘correct’ Li(禮) practiced clearly did not exist, each insisted that their practice conformed to Li(禮). As a result, these conflicts arose.
    From this point of view, I investigated that after the acceptance of the method of separately greeting Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書) in the reign of King Sŏngjong(the king riding a horse when greeting Chikseo related to this), Chosŏn overturned this acceptance and then the king rode a palanquin to greet both Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書) at once, and even the procedure of riding in a palanquin was finally realized even when greeting Chikseo(勅書). Specifically, the process by which the king rode a palanquin to greet both Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書) at once, and the achievement of riding the palanquin even when greeting Chikseo(勅書) and how this achievement was achieved was reviewed, and I tried to identify the historical context and meaning of this process. In particular, I examined the context in which unusually, the Chosŏn government went so far as to break ritual rules and implemented the practice of having the king ride on a palanquin instead of a horse when greeting Chikseo(勅書), and the context in which it also justified riding a palanquin when the Chosŏn government was greeting a Chikseo(勅書).
    Previous studies have assumed that a deepening and transformation of Sadae(事大) consciousness toward Ming at some point in time, and have used Chosŏn’s acceptance of Ming Dynasty envoys’ claims as an indicator of the deepening and transformation of Sadae(事大) consciousness toward Ming, focusing on the action of Chosŏn’s acceptance of Ming Dynasty envoys’ claims and attributing significance to it as a trigger for the deepening and transformation of Sadae(事大) consciousness toward Ming. However, this paper, which also examined the post-acceptance of aspect of Ming Dynasty envoys’ claims, suggests that Chosŏn’s choice and will were decisive in the outcome of the conflict between Chosŏn and Ming envoys. It should not be judged as an opportunity to deepen and transform the Sadae(事大) consciousness toward Ming.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“한국문화”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2026년 03월 22일 일요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
11:18 오후