파리 톨레랑스 - 사르코지 신자유주의 개혁과 톨레랑스 제로 1995-2007 - (Paris, Capital of Tolerance)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 부산경남사학회
· 수록지 정보 : 역사와경계 / 68호 / 329 ~ 370페이지
· 저자명 : 이학수

초록

A number of scholars believe that the Reformation of French right-wing party (Reformation), which underwent from 1995 to 2007, and the Counter-Manifestation of the Reformation mirror Revolution of May 1968. However, more appropriate point of view would be to say the Reformation claimed a separation from Social Party government and accomplished its own arguments and plans. This claim tried not only to destroy the values and logics of Social Party, but also to amend the value of Tolerance which left wing parties tried to preserve.
In order to show that their reform policy cannot coexist with citizen government self-governing or socialist ideology, the right-wing government seem to have tried to handle Tolerance. Although the right-wing government has not touched on sensitive religion issue of Islam yet, it is obvious that they were going to put a restriction on illegal immigrant issue, social right, and social providence. Like this, the anti-Tolerance policy of the right-wing government faced severe resistance, but the right-wing government still won the election, and a survey of public opinion did not seem too bad. Therefore, we know the fact that Parisians tried to preserve the value of Tolerance did not cause them to doubt about the governing power of the right-wing government.
Taking the current (2007-2008) political circumstances into consideration, Paris has low possibility of recovering the past status of Tolerance. This is due to the late 20th century's structural contradiction, which occurred globally. Even though the phenomenon of international migration of workers, failure of socialism, and rise of neo-democracy arose, there was no clear resistance or measure to these phenomenon. Therefore, it is too early for one to decide that Parisians will continue to maintain the value of Tolerance along with the immigrant problems and multi-cultural characteristics.
The reason why the Parisians showed confused attitude towards Tolerance was because of the rebirth of nationalism, egocentrism, racialism and others that once thought to be expelled from the French. This phenomenon occurred all over Europe with a peculiar combination of conservatism and neo-liberalism after the real socialism collapsed.
However, Paris will not give up Tolerance easily. Because, Paris has succeeded its fame and vitality as an international city through maintaining generosity and open-mindedness. Also because, Parisians already understand that the moment they give up Tolerance, Paris would lose vitality and creativity that Paris has always possessed.
We can find the possibility of Tolerance when the Parisians elected a social party mayor in 2001 and 2008 municipal elections, even though they elected the right-wing government and president. The reason why the rich Paris elected a social party mayor is because they believed that he, as the head of a municipal organization, could preserve the value of the Tolerance by maintaining environmental and residential policies, which are two new visions of international city. Besides, if the mayor was a sexual minority (he is homosexual), haven't Parisians given him the biggest Tolerance, and asked for the same from him?

영어초록

A number of scholars believe that the Reformation of French right-wing party (Reformation), which underwent from 1995 to 2007, and the Counter-Manifestation of the Reformation mirror Revolution of May 1968. However, more appropriate point of view would be to say the Reformation claimed a separation from Social Party government and accomplished its own arguments and plans. This claim tried not only to destroy the values and logics of Social Party, but also to amend the value of Tolerance which left wing parties tried to preserve.
In order to show that their reform policy cannot coexist with citizen government self-governing or socialist ideology, the right-wing government seem to have tried to handle Tolerance. Although the right-wing government has not touched on sensitive religion issue of Islam yet, it is obvious that they were going to put a restriction on illegal immigrant issue, social right, and social providence. Like this, the anti-Tolerance policy of the right-wing government faced severe resistance, but the right-wing government still won the election, and a survey of public opinion did not seem too bad. Therefore, we know the fact that Parisians tried to preserve the value of Tolerance did not cause them to doubt about the governing power of the right-wing government.
Taking the current (2007-2008) political circumstances into consideration, Paris has low possibility of recovering the past status of Tolerance. This is due to the late 20th century's structural contradiction, which occurred globally. Even though the phenomenon of international migration of workers, failure of socialism, and rise of neo-democracy arose, there was no clear resistance or measure to these phenomenon. Therefore, it is too early for one to decide that Parisians will continue to maintain the value of Tolerance along with the immigrant problems and multi-cultural characteristics.
The reason why the Parisians showed confused attitude towards Tolerance was because of the rebirth of nationalism, egocentrism, racialism and others that once thought to be expelled from the French. This phenomenon occurred all over Europe with a peculiar combination of conservatism and neo-liberalism after the real socialism collapsed.
However, Paris will not give up Tolerance easily. Because, Paris has succeeded its fame and vitality as an international city through maintaining generosity and open-mindedness. Also because, Parisians already understand that the moment they give up Tolerance, Paris would lose vitality and creativity that Paris has always possessed.
We can find the possibility of Tolerance when the Parisians elected a social party mayor in 2001 and 2008 municipal elections, even though they elected the right-wing government and president. The reason why the rich Paris elected a social party mayor is because they believed that he, as the head of a municipal organization, could preserve the value of the Tolerance by maintaining environmental and residential policies, which are two new visions of international city. Besides, if the mayor was a sexual minority (he is homosexual), haven't Parisians given him the biggest Tolerance, and asked for the same from him?

참고자료

· 없음