일상적 장소성과 관계적 공간성의 두 변증법 -『서울, 어느 날 소설이 되다』와 『서울, 밤의 산책자들』을 중심으로- (The Two Dialectic for Daily Sense of Place and Relative Sense of Space)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 중앙어문학회
· 수록지 정보 : 어문론집 / 50권 / 451 ~ 478페이지
· 저자명 : 조명기

초록

Based on Seoul becomes a novel one day and Seoul. night strollers and texts, the purpose of this study is to find out through which method a daily sense of place and a relative sense of space combine together at a local horizon and how they affect interaction, and to find out which locality is produced as a result.
The two novels, while emphasizing Seoul, a daily space, as a modern and urban space, while taking a double attitude such as adaption and denial. The reason that Seoul is exclusively reproducing modernity and urbanity is that two texts progress based on a neoliberal structure in which ‘difference’ coverts into ‘exclusiveness.’ The only way for novels with regular interest in a relative sense of space to recognize and reproduce locals other than Seoul is through a knowledge system.
Novels that deal with Seoul’s relative sense of space cites and imitates a conventional knowledge system, while executing a modification by targeting this knowledge system at the same time.
The ultimate double attitude reproduced by these two texts is associated with a method connecting both place and space. Such double attitude acknowledges a clearly existing contradiction between idealistic dialectic that integrates modern order and the non-identity that can disintegrate a conventional knowledge system by producing and extracting an non-identity within a long-held tradition of recognizing Seoul and regional area as an identity and within a knowledge system.
This attempt refers to coexistence of negative dialectic aimed to build a new knowledge system.

영어초록

Based on Seoul becomes a novel one day and Seoul. night strollers and texts, the purpose of this study is to find out through which method a daily sense of place and a relative sense of space combine together at a local horizon and how they affect interaction, and to find out which locality is produced as a result.
The two novels, while emphasizing Seoul, a daily space, as a modern and urban space, while taking a double attitude such as adaption and denial. The reason that Seoul is exclusively reproducing modernity and urbanity is that two texts progress based on a neoliberal structure in which ‘difference’ coverts into ‘exclusiveness.’ The only way for novels with regular interest in a relative sense of space to recognize and reproduce locals other than Seoul is through a knowledge system.
Novels that deal with Seoul’s relative sense of space cites and imitates a conventional knowledge system, while executing a modification by targeting this knowledge system at the same time.
The ultimate double attitude reproduced by these two texts is associated with a method connecting both place and space. Such double attitude acknowledges a clearly existing contradiction between idealistic dialectic that integrates modern order and the non-identity that can disintegrate a conventional knowledge system by producing and extracting an non-identity within a long-held tradition of recognizing Seoul and regional area as an identity and within a knowledge system.
This attempt refers to coexistence of negative dialectic aimed to build a new knowledge system.

참고자료

· 없음