나가이 가후와 시마자키 도손의 프랑스체험-귀국이후 대비적 양상에 대하여- (Kafū Nagai’s and Tōson Shimazaki’s Experience in France-Contrastive Aspects after Returning Home-)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국외국어대학교 일본연구소
· 수록지 정보 : 일본연구 / 84호 / 147 ~ 165페이지
· 저자명 : 천선미

초록

본고는 나가이 가후와 시마자키 도손의 프랑스체류 이후의 삶과 문학이 대비적 양상을 보이게 된 요인을 추적하고자 하였다. 도불이전 두 사람은 프랑스에 대한 동경이 있었으나, 프랑스체험 후 상반된 양상을 보였다. 가후는변함없는 ‘유토피아’였으나 도손은 이상이 아닌 현실적인 프랑스를 보았다. 두 사람의 상반된 체험은 귀국이후 각자의 삶과 문학에 큰 영향을 주었다. 가후는 서양을 모방한 서툰 일본식 근대제도를 폄하하고 국가와 가족 모두를 부정하였다. 반면 도손은 부모로서 충실하였으며 시대에 순응하고 국가시책에도 협조하는 등 지극히 현실적인 삶과 문학을 전개해 나갔다.

영어초록

Both Kafū Nagai and Tōson Shimazaki had sought lives in France before moving there, but had contrasting perceptions of their actual experiences. France had always been the perfect country of art and ‘Utopia’ to Kafū. But when Tōson confronted France’s reality that differed from his ideal society, he realized the importance of country and family that he had never considered in his home country. Their opposite perspectives of France influenced their lives and literature after returning to Japan. Kafū diminished the Japanese poor modern system in the Edo period, which imitated the West and denied his own country and family as well, because they were totally different from his own ‘Utopia’. Yet Tōson was faithful as a parent, made compromises with the times, and cooperated with national policy. It can be seen that the contrast between the two is based on the “contradictory perception of France”, due to the circumstances in which each lived. Kafū could say directly whatever on his mind and lived a free life because he was the eldest son of a family with considerable power and wealth, so he did not need to flatter the government to gain what he wanted. And most of all, he had no family to support. Yet Tōson might have adapted to the turbulent period and lived a normal life for the security of his family, as a parent who wanted “to protect his children from all the storms of uncertain times”.

참고자료

· 없음