明·淸시기 4종 古詩選集에 나타난 漢代 詩歌 비교 분석 ― 『古詩紀』와 『采菽堂古詩選』·『古詩源』·『古詩賞析』을 중심으로 (Comparative Analysis of Poems in Han Dynasty in 4 Collection Books of Ancient Poems Made in Ming and Ching Dynasties: Focusing on "Gosigi", "Chaesukdanggosiseon", "Gisiwon" and "Gosisangseok")

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 중국어문학연구회
· 수록지 정보 : 중국어문학논집 / 119호 / 331 ~ 354페이지
· 저자명 : 김희경

초록

As a way of finding out how the scholars in Ming and Ching Dynasties evaluated the poems made in Han Dynasty, 4 collection books of ancient poems such as "Gosigi","Chaesukdanggosiseon","Gisiwon" and "Gosisangseok" were selected for the comparative analysis of the poems made in Han Dynasty. These 4 collection books are something in common as they are the books of the old poems complied by the type of poems and that they have the same selection range.
As for the ratio of poems made in Han Dynasty among the total poems collected in 4 collection books, the poems made in Han Dynasty take up about 5.4% in Gosigi, and about 18% in Gosiwon. They take up as high as 15% in Gosisangseok, thus showing that the poems made in Han Dynasty were highly evaluated. As for the layout, in case of Chaesukdanggosiseon, the poems made in Han Dynasty are put in the front section of the collection books, unlike the layout made in other 3 collection books.
The poems made in Han Dynasty in 4 collection books of ancient poems were made in the list and, based on them, the characteristics of the poems made in Han Dynasty can be summarized as follows.
First, in Gosigi, Gosiwon and Gosisangseok, the poems whose authors are known are put in front section of the books, followed by the poems made by minganakbu and those whose authors are unknown while in Chaesukdanggosiseon, the poems made by minganakbu were put in the front section of the books.
Second, as for the ratio of minganakbu among the poems made in Han Dynasty in each collection books, it was high with 40.3% for Gosigi and 46.3% for Gosisangseok while it was the lowest with 36% in Gosiwon, thus showing the different evaluation for minganakbu. In addition, as for the type of minganakbu, there was no jipgayosa in Chaesukdanggosiseon, thus showing that there have been the different perspectives over the type of minganakbu.
Third, the fact that 65 poems which were made in Han Dynasty as acquired from the joint list of 4 collection books show that they are still highly appreciated even in the collection of books of poems made in Ming and Ching Dynasties.

영어초록

As a way of finding out how the scholars in Ming and Ching Dynasties evaluated the poems made in Han Dynasty, 4 collection books of ancient poems such as "Gosigi","Chaesukdanggosiseon","Gisiwon" and "Gosisangseok" were selected for the comparative analysis of the poems made in Han Dynasty. These 4 collection books are something in common as they are the books of the old poems complied by the type of poems and that they have the same selection range.
As for the ratio of poems made in Han Dynasty among the total poems collected in 4 collection books, the poems made in Han Dynasty take up about 5.4% in Gosigi, and about 18% in Gosiwon. They take up as high as 15% in Gosisangseok, thus showing that the poems made in Han Dynasty were highly evaluated. As for the layout, in case of Chaesukdanggosiseon, the poems made in Han Dynasty are put in the front section of the collection books, unlike the layout made in other 3 collection books.
The poems made in Han Dynasty in 4 collection books of ancient poems were made in the list and, based on them, the characteristics of the poems made in Han Dynasty can be summarized as follows.
First, in Gosigi, Gosiwon and Gosisangseok, the poems whose authors are known are put in front section of the books, followed by the poems made by minganakbu and those whose authors are unknown while in Chaesukdanggosiseon, the poems made by minganakbu were put in the front section of the books.
Second, as for the ratio of minganakbu among the poems made in Han Dynasty in each collection books, it was high with 40.3% for Gosigi and 46.3% for Gosisangseok while it was the lowest with 36% in Gosiwon, thus showing the different evaluation for minganakbu. In addition, as for the type of minganakbu, there was no jipgayosa in Chaesukdanggosiseon, thus showing that there have been the different perspectives over the type of minganakbu.
Third, the fact that 65 poems which were made in Han Dynasty as acquired from the joint list of 4 collection books show that they are still highly appreciated even in the collection of books of poems made in Ming and Ching Dynasties.

참고자료

· 없음