• AI글쓰기 2.1 업데이트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

당-고려 인사행정에서 시행된 관인 심사제도의 비교사적 검토 (A Comparative Historical Review of the Official Verification System Implemented in the Tang Dynasty and Koryo Personnel Administration)

52 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.04.10 최종저작일 2023.01
52P 미리보기
당-고려 인사행정에서 시행된 관인 심사제도의 비교사적 검토
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 수선사학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 사림 / 83호 / 163 ~ 214페이지
    · 저자명 : 박재우, 顾成瑞

    초록

    This paper aims to examine comparative historically the system that examined whether officials who received government posts in the personnel administration of the Tang and Goryeo were eligible for it.
    The Tang's bureaucracy spread widely in east asian society, and Goryeo accepted it, established a bureaucracy and operated a personnel system. However, the Goryeo system did not follow the Tang's system. Therefore, it is meaningful to review the verification system comparative historically in the personnel administration of the Tang and Goryeo.
    The Tang's personnel procedures and verification system were divided into two according to the grade and importance of government posts. The 5th or higher and special government posts were recommended by the ministers and selected by the emperor, while the 6th or lower grades were selected by the Ministry of Civil Personnel and the Ministry of Military Affairs and appointed by the emperor.
    In the process of drafting personnel orders or issuing personnel orders to go through Chancellery for State Affairs, the 5th or higher and special government posts were reviewed. For the 5th or higher and special government posts, the government officials were examined when the Imperial letter drafted or distributed and passed through Chancellery for State Affairs. For those with 6th or lower grades, the list was submitted to the emperor after the selection of the Ministry of Civil Personnel and the Ministry of Military Affairs was completed, and the officials were reviewed in the process of passing through Department of State Affairs and Chancellery for State Affairs.
    The personnel administration and the verification system of Goryeo were quite different from those of the Tang Dynasty. First of all, Goryeo did not distinguish the method of personnel administration according to the high and low of government posts. Therefore, the Ministry of Civil Personnel and the Ministry of Military Affairs selected the entire civil service officers and military officers, did not give the ministers the right to personnel affairs.
    Next, the Ministry of Civil Personnel and the Ministry of Military Affairs posted the results of the selection to the king and received approval, but it was directly delivered to the king without passing through Department of State Affairs and Chancellery for State Affairs. In Goryeo, the way of operating the three chancelleries six branches of the cabinet system was different from Tang, so it was directly told between the king and the six branches of the cabinet system. Therefore, the official verification was not conducted until the king's approval was obtained.
    In addition, all of the Tang Dynasty's letters of appointment were prepared and issued after deliberation by Chancellery for State Affairs, enabling qualification screening for all government officials. However, in Goryeo, not all letters of appointment were prepared and issued after deliberation by Department of Royal Secretariat-Chancellery because the type of letters of appointment was different from Tang Dynasty. Therefore, it was difficult to create a system to examine the official verification in relation to the issuance of a letter of appointment. When this happened, Goryeo established a system of the review candidates recommended for office implemented by the ministers and censorate officials to examine the government officials.
    The Tang Dynasty's distribution of personnel rights and screening system is aimed at reducing favoritism and wrongdoing in the selection process. In particular, high-ranking officials were selected through consultation between the monarch and the ministers, and provided a lot of information to review through Policy Reviewer and advice from officials. This was characterized by negotiation politics. The system of Goryeo of the review candidates recommended for office system prevented the king's arbitrary selection of government officials, respected the king's right to make decisions on personnel appointments, and had the character of consulting between the king and the bureaucrats.

    영어초록

    This paper aims to examine comparative historically the system that examined whether officials who received government posts in the personnel administration of the Tang and Goryeo were eligible for it.
    The Tang's bureaucracy spread widely in east asian society, and Goryeo accepted it, established a bureaucracy and operated a personnel system. However, the Goryeo system did not follow the Tang's system. Therefore, it is meaningful to review the verification system comparative historically in the personnel administration of the Tang and Goryeo.
    The Tang's personnel procedures and verification system were divided into two according to the grade and importance of government posts. The 5th or higher and special government posts were recommended by the ministers and selected by the emperor, while the 6th or lower grades were selected by the Ministry of Civil Personnel and the Ministry of Military Affairs and appointed by the emperor.
    In the process of drafting personnel orders or issuing personnel orders to go through Chancellery for State Affairs, the 5th or higher and special government posts were reviewed. For the 5th or higher and special government posts, the government officials were examined when the Imperial letter drafted or distributed and passed through Chancellery for State Affairs. For those with 6th or lower grades, the list was submitted to the emperor after the selection of the Ministry of Civil Personnel and the Ministry of Military Affairs was completed, and the officials were reviewed in the process of passing through Department of State Affairs and Chancellery for State Affairs.
    The personnel administration and the verification system of Goryeo were quite different from those of the Tang Dynasty. First of all, Goryeo did not distinguish the method of personnel administration according to the high and low of government posts. Therefore, the Ministry of Civil Personnel and the Ministry of Military Affairs selected the entire civil service officers and military officers, did not give the ministers the right to personnel affairs.
    Next, the Ministry of Civil Personnel and the Ministry of Military Affairs posted the results of the selection to the king and received approval, but it was directly delivered to the king without passing through Department of State Affairs and Chancellery for State Affairs. In Goryeo, the way of operating the three chancelleries six branches of the cabinet system was different from Tang, so it was directly told between the king and the six branches of the cabinet system. Therefore, the official verification was not conducted until the king's approval was obtained.
    In addition, all of the Tang Dynasty's letters of appointment were prepared and issued after deliberation by Chancellery for State Affairs, enabling qualification screening for all government officials. However, in Goryeo, not all letters of appointment were prepared and issued after deliberation by Department of Royal Secretariat-Chancellery because the type of letters of appointment was different from Tang Dynasty. Therefore, it was difficult to create a system to examine the official verification in relation to the issuance of a letter of appointment. When this happened, Goryeo established a system of the review candidates recommended for office implemented by the ministers and censorate officials to examine the government officials.
    The Tang Dynasty's distribution of personnel rights and screening system is aimed at reducing favoritism and wrongdoing in the selection process. In particular, high-ranking officials were selected through consultation between the monarch and the ministers, and provided a lot of information to review through Policy Reviewer and advice from officials. This was characterized by negotiation politics. The system of Goryeo of the review candidates recommended for office system prevented the king's arbitrary selection of government officials, respected the king's right to make decisions on personnel appointments, and had the character of consulting between the king and the bureaucrats.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“사림”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
  • 전문가 요청 쿠폰 이벤트
  • 전문가요청 배너
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 12월 07일 일요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
11:29 오후