• 전문가 요청 쿠폰 이벤트
PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

1950년대 후반 동독 사통당(SED)의 국가연합 통일안 (The SED-Concept of a National Confederation in the Late 1950s)

35 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.04.10 최종저작일 2009.09
35P 미리보기
1950년대 후반 동독 사통당(SED)의 국가연합 통일안
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 한국서양사학회
    · 수록지 정보 : 서양사론 / 102호 / 285 ~ 319페이지
    · 저자명 : 이동기

    초록

    From the integral perspective of the German contemporary history
    one could find out basically quite a lot common grounds and
    similarities of historical developments in two German states. But the
    more important thing is to explore various aspects of interweaving
    and inter-determination of two German states. The SED-concept of
    a national confederation as way to the German reunification had come
    into being from inofficial contacts and dialogs between West-German
    politicians and East-German representatives. The SED- le a d e r s h i p
    h a d to re s p o n d to p o litic a l d is c o n te n ts o f b o th o p p o s itio n a l
    groups within the SED and younger generations who had looked
    forward to a national perspective. Suggesting the concept of a German
    confederation the SED was able to let not only a new dimension of
    reunification-discussion open, but make also a German-German
    common thinking-space and expectations-horizon. Quite a few other
    west-German Ost-policies after 1957 were stimulated by the
    confederation-plans of the SED. In addition, West-German alternative
    models of the reunification including confederation-model has developed
    themselves from competing with the confederation-concept of the
    SED.
    But, the confederation-concept of the SED can be principally regarded
    as political manoeuvre which were never seriously prepared for a
    German-German negotiation or compromise. It aimed at the ‘democratic
    transformation’ of the political situation in the FRG. The SED-leader
    saw in the Adenauer-government of the FRG none dialog-partner
    from the beginning. The prerequisites which the SED had laid claim
    to for a negotiating table on a confederation caused only to question
    the true will of the East-German communists for a national unification.
    Still, theirs own national strategy and notion of the future development
    must be taken into consideration. The SED-leadership depended
    above all on the revolutionary change within the SPD and the working
    class in the FRG. For the East-German communist the radicalized
    SPD could be the credible partner of a national confederation.
    Moreover the SED-leader, especially Walter Ulbricht, were great
    believer in that the socialist system of the GDR would arise up as
    the last winner over the capitalist system of the West-Germany
    someday. These illusionary notions of the present and coming German
    situation allowed the East-German communists ironically to conceive
    meaningful methods in a national confederation as increasing contacts
    and economic cooperations. According to their conviction, the GDR
    could profit by the economic and technical superiority of the FRG in
    a confederative cooperation. In this respect the confederation-concept
    of the SED was more than pure propaganda.

    영어초록

    From the integral perspective of the German contemporary history
    one could find out basically quite a lot common grounds and
    similarities of historical developments in two German states. But the
    more important thing is to explore various aspects of interweaving
    and inter-determination of two German states. The SED-concept of
    a national confederation as way to the German reunification had come
    into being from inofficial contacts and dialogs between West-German
    politicians and East-German representatives. The SED- le a d e r s h i p
    h a d to re s p o n d to p o litic a l d is c o n te n ts o f b o th o p p o s itio n a l
    groups within the SED and younger generations who had looked
    forward to a national perspective. Suggesting the concept of a German
    confederation the SED was able to let not only a new dimension of
    reunification-discussion open, but make also a German-German
    common thinking-space and expectations-horizon. Quite a few other
    west-German Ost-policies after 1957 were stimulated by the
    confederation-plans of the SED. In addition, West-German alternative
    models of the reunification including confederation-model has developed
    themselves from competing with the confederation-concept of the
    SED.
    But, the confederation-concept of the SED can be principally regarded
    as political manoeuvre which were never seriously prepared for a
    German-German negotiation or compromise. It aimed at the ‘democratic
    transformation’ of the political situation in the FRG. The SED-leader
    saw in the Adenauer-government of the FRG none dialog-partner
    from the beginning. The prerequisites which the SED had laid claim
    to for a negotiating table on a confederation caused only to question
    the true will of the East-German communists for a national unification.
    Still, theirs own national strategy and notion of the future development
    must be taken into consideration. The SED-leadership depended
    above all on the revolutionary change within the SPD and the working
    class in the FRG. For the East-German communist the radicalized
    SPD could be the credible partner of a national confederation.
    Moreover the SED-leader, especially Walter Ulbricht, were great
    believer in that the socialist system of the GDR would arise up as
    the last winner over the capitalist system of the West-Germany
    someday. These illusionary notions of the present and coming German
    situation allowed the East-German communists ironically to conceive
    meaningful methods in a national confederation as increasing contacts
    and economic cooperations. According to their conviction, the GDR
    could profit by the economic and technical superiority of the FRG in
    a confederative cooperation. In this respect the confederation-concept
    of the SED was more than pure propaganda.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우

“서양사론”의 다른 논문도 확인해 보세요!

문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요 해피캠퍼스의 20년의 운영 노하우를 이용하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 AI가 방대한 정보를 재가공하여, 최적의 목차와 내용을 자동으로 만들어 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 이용권를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2026년 03월 21일 토요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
10:23 오전