PARTNER
검증된 파트너 제휴사 자료

일제의 한국 강점과 재한일본인 거류민단의 재편 (The Reorganization of Japanese Settlement Corporation under the Japanese Occupation over Korean Peninsula)

49 페이지
기타파일
최초등록일 2025.04.09 최종저작일 2014.06
49P 미리보기
일제의 한국 강점과 재한일본인 거류민단의 재편
  • 미리보기

    서지정보

    · 발행기관 : 역사학연구소
    · 수록지 정보 : 역사연구 / 26호 / 147 ~ 195페이지
    · 저자명 : 천지명

    초록

    In 1908, the Japanese imperialism planed abolition of conception of the settlement, after then it is confirmed that they attempted to change in charge of the task.
    Abolishing the settlement system and trying to reorganize a unitary administration intended to charge the cost of public facilities to foreigners and Koreans. However, the law of settlement corporation could be abolished after merger because it was the laws only forced to a foreign settlement. A settlement corporation aware of this fact carried out premature theory not opposeed to abolish of a settlement corporation. Differences in the level of Korean and Japanese, hindrance of privilege of Japanese immigrants, etc. was issued. The Government General caused uselessness of a settlement corporation about these issues. The reason was that was nothing more than training minor officials institutions. Human Resources of the Government General emphasized that administrative district system was only for Japanese in the cost. Japanese had only paid for the cost of public facilities was extended to Koreans and foreigners.
    Japanese Settlement in Korea had predicted the abolition of their corporation. So, they had requested alternative independent organization. Nominally, they had asserted their contribution for Japanese immigration and settlement. The abolition of the corporation had been related with permission of political intervention. Japanese Settlement Corporation had argued maintenance of independent organization but, the corporation had gone out of force officially. August, 1913, the Japanese Government General of Korea had announced policy for an administrative district(Pusystem) to disapprove the independent organization.
    Officially, independent organization had been disapproved. But, succeeding independent organization had been run consistently in Kyung-Sung, Bu-San, etc.
    Similarly. Pu-Council(Pu-hyopeuhoi) had replaced the position of Japanese Settlement Corporation under the authorities of the Japanese Government General of Korea.
    Partially, self-governing in Japanese settlement had been persisted.
    In conclusion, Japanese Settlement Corporation had raised trouble with the Japanese Government General of Korea and the Residency-General ostensibly. But, on the other hand, Japanese Settlement Corporation had lend Japanese a helping hand for residence and settlement in colonial Korea with assisstance from the Japanese Government General of Korea and the Residency-General. Japanese Settlement Corporation had represented profit of Japanese settlement and justified their position. Contrast with Japanese Government General of Korea and the Residency-General, Japanese Settlement Coropration had conducted invasion policies in other ways.

    영어초록

    In 1908, the Japanese imperialism planed abolition of conception of the settlement, after then it is confirmed that they attempted to change in charge of the task.
    Abolishing the settlement system and trying to reorganize a unitary administration intended to charge the cost of public facilities to foreigners and Koreans. However, the law of settlement corporation could be abolished after merger because it was the laws only forced to a foreign settlement. A settlement corporation aware of this fact carried out premature theory not opposeed to abolish of a settlement corporation. Differences in the level of Korean and Japanese, hindrance of privilege of Japanese immigrants, etc. was issued. The Government General caused uselessness of a settlement corporation about these issues. The reason was that was nothing more than training minor officials institutions. Human Resources of the Government General emphasized that administrative district system was only for Japanese in the cost. Japanese had only paid for the cost of public facilities was extended to Koreans and foreigners.
    Japanese Settlement in Korea had predicted the abolition of their corporation. So, they had requested alternative independent organization. Nominally, they had asserted their contribution for Japanese immigration and settlement. The abolition of the corporation had been related with permission of political intervention. Japanese Settlement Corporation had argued maintenance of independent organization but, the corporation had gone out of force officially. August, 1913, the Japanese Government General of Korea had announced policy for an administrative district(Pusystem) to disapprove the independent organization.
    Officially, independent organization had been disapproved. But, succeeding independent organization had been run consistently in Kyung-Sung, Bu-San, etc.
    Similarly. Pu-Council(Pu-hyopeuhoi) had replaced the position of Japanese Settlement Corporation under the authorities of the Japanese Government General of Korea.
    Partially, self-governing in Japanese settlement had been persisted.
    In conclusion, Japanese Settlement Corporation had raised trouble with the Japanese Government General of Korea and the Residency-General ostensibly. But, on the other hand, Japanese Settlement Corporation had lend Japanese a helping hand for residence and settlement in colonial Korea with assisstance from the Japanese Government General of Korea and the Residency-General. Japanese Settlement Corporation had represented profit of Japanese settlement and justified their position. Contrast with Japanese Government General of Korea and the Residency-General, Japanese Settlement Coropration had conducted invasion policies in other ways.

    참고자료

    · 없음
  • 자주묻는질문의 답변을 확인해 주세요

    해피캠퍼스 FAQ 더보기

    꼭 알아주세요

    • 자료의 정보 및 내용의 진실성에 대하여 해피캠퍼스는 보증하지 않으며, 해당 정보 및 게시물 저작권과 기타 법적 책임은 자료 등록자에게 있습니다.
      자료 및 게시물 내용의 불법적 이용, 무단 전재∙배포는 금지되어 있습니다.
      저작권침해, 명예훼손 등 분쟁 요소 발견 시 고객센터의 저작권침해 신고센터를 이용해 주시기 바랍니다.
    • 해피캠퍼스는 구매자와 판매자 모두가 만족하는 서비스가 되도록 노력하고 있으며, 아래의 4가지 자료환불 조건을 꼭 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
      파일오류 중복자료 저작권 없음 설명과 실제 내용 불일치
      파일의 다운로드가 제대로 되지 않거나 파일형식에 맞는 프로그램으로 정상 작동하지 않는 경우 다른 자료와 70% 이상 내용이 일치하는 경우 (중복임을 확인할 수 있는 근거 필요함) 인터넷의 다른 사이트, 연구기관, 학교, 서적 등의 자료를 도용한 경우 자료의 설명과 실제 자료의 내용이 일치하지 않는 경우
문서 초안을 생성해주는 EasyAI
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스의 방대한 자료 중에서 선별하여 당신만의 초안을 만들어주는 EasyAI 입니다.
저는 아래와 같이 작업을 도와드립니다.
- 주제만 입력하면 목차부터 본문내용까지 자동 생성해 드립니다.
- 장문의 콘텐츠를 쉽고 빠르게 작성해 드립니다.
- 스토어에서 무료 캐시를 계정별로 1회 발급 받을 수 있습니다. 지금 바로 체험해 보세요!
이런 주제들을 입력해 보세요.
- 유아에게 적합한 문학작품의 기준과 특성
- 한국인의 가치관 중에서 정신적 가치관을 이루는 것들을 문화적 문법으로 정리하고, 현대한국사회에서 일어나는 사건과 사고를 비교하여 자신의 의견으로 기술하세요
- 작별인사 독후감
해캠 AI 챗봇과 대화하기
챗봇으로 간편하게 상담해보세요.
2025년 08월 05일 화요일
AI 챗봇
안녕하세요. 해피캠퍼스 AI 챗봇입니다. 무엇이 궁금하신가요?
2:23 오전