타이타늄 표면 처리 특성에 따른 젖음성에 관한 연구 (Wettability of titanium implants depending upon surface properties)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 대한치과보철학회
· 수록지 정보 : 대한치과보철학회지 / 47권 / 1호 / 12 ~ 20페이지
· 저자명 : 한영수, 신상완

초록

연구목적: 임플란트가 식립되어질 때 매식체는 조직액과 접촉하게 된다. 임플란트의 조직액 흡착은 표면처리에 따라 다양하게 나타난다. 이 때 임플란트 시편의 표면 거칠기와 젖음성과의 상관관계를 분석하고자 하였다.
연구재료 및 방법: 표면 거칠기와 젖음성의 상관관계를 측정하기 위해 네 종류의 임플란트 시편을 각각 5종류 만들었다. 각각의 그룹은 그룹 A: Machined Surface, 그룹 B: Anodized surface, 그룹 C: RBM (HA blasting) surface, 그룹 D: CMP (calcium methaphosphate) coating surface이다.
연구결과: 1. 표면의 거칠기는 RBM, CMP, Anodized, Machined 그룹 순서로 거칠었다. RBM과 CMP는 통계적으로 유의차가 없었다 (P < .05). 2. 젖음성은 Anodized, RBM, CMP, Machined 그룹 순서로 높았다. CMP와 Machined는 통계적으로 유의차가 없었다 (P < .05). 3. 표면 거칠기와 젖음성과의 상관관계는 없었다.

영어초록

Statement of problem: When an implant is fixed, a fixture comes into contact with a tissue fluid. Adhesion of a tissue fluid to a surface of implant is various case by case. Purpose: The ultimate goal of this work is to analyze a correlation between a surface roughness and wettability of implant specimens. A measurement for wettability is performed considering 4 types of specimen implant with surface treatments different from each other to investigate the change of wettability with the elapse of time. Material and methods: Firstly, 20 specimens of titanium were prepared. The specimen were made of a commercial Titanium Grade IV with the diameter of 10 mm and the thickness of 1 mm. According to the method of surface treatment, the specimens were classified into 4 groups of 5 specimens per group. Group A: Machined Surface Group B: Anodized surface Group C: RBM (HA blasting) surface Group D: CMP (calcium methaphosphate) coating surface. Surface roughness of specimen was measured using SV-3000S4 (Mituyoto, Japan). The measurement was based on the standard of JIS1994. Sessile drop method was used to measure the wettability, which measures contact angle between implant disc and saline with the time interval of 5, 10, and 15 seconds. SPSS 11.0 was used to analyze the collected data. In order to analyze the difference of wettability and surface roughness according to implant surface treatment method. The statistical significance was tested with the confidence level of 95%. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation of surface roughness and wettability. Results: The difference of surface roughness was statistically significant in the order of Group C (1.69 ± 0.26), Group D (1.58 ± 0.16), Group B (0.78 ± 0.14) Group A (0.18 ± 0.05). The wettability has also a statistically significant difference, which was in the order of group B (17.70 ± 2.66), Group C (27.86 ± 4.52), Group D (66.28 ± 3.70) Group A (70.52 ± 8.00). There was no difference in wettability with the passage of time. Conclusions: 1. The surface roughness was high in the order of RBM, CMP, Anodized, Machined group (P < .05). 2. The wettability was high in the order of Anodized, RBM, CMP, Machined group (P < .05). 3. There was no statistical significance in the correlation of surface roughness and wettability.

참고자료

· 없음