千慮與一失: 論錢鍾書《管錐編》對經學典籍的詮釋 (Interpretation on Confucian Classics in Qian Zhong Shu’s Guanzhui Bian)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국중국학회
· 수록지 정보 : 중국학보 / 100호 / 451 ~ 473페이지
· 저자명 : Hugo Wai-ho Wong

초록

《管錐編》是錢鍾書的學術研究結晶，其中有涉及經學者，主要見於《周易正義》 《毛詩正義》《左傳正義》。此三章體現錢氏對經籍的思辨能力，以及兼採傳統與現代的詮釋 方法。總括《管錐編》對經學典籍的詮釋，大致可以歸結為三點:一，突破傳統經學研究的 界限;二，在批判與疑古的前提下，提出個人對經籍的創見;三，以辯證統一的思維模式解 經。與此同時，《管錐編》的經學論述疑義有三:一，論述似乎忽略實證或歷史文化的一面， 以致若干地方產生誤解;二，立論似有概念不清，尤其誤將經籍原意與後人詮釋相混;三， 解經似乎偏向複雜，尤其以生僻名物及西方思想來解經。平情而論，《管錐編》賦經籍以新 的學術生命，突破傳統的訓詁及義理分析，對經學發展具有不容否定的創新價值;但傳統經 學的界線被消弭，經籍似乎變成錢氏闡發個人學術思想的一個文本，甚至淪為文藝、文化或 哲學的附庸，因而對經學的發展有正反的兩面。

영어초록

Guanzhui Bian is a notable academic collection conducted by Qian Zhong-Shu, but it seems that scholars pay less attention to his interpretation on Confucian Classics, which can be found in the chapters namely “Commentary on the Book of Changes”(Zhouyi Zhengyi), “Commentary on the Book of Songs”(Maoshi Zhengyi), and “Commentary on the Spring and Autumn Annal”(Zuozhuan Zhengyi). By acquiring traditional and modern methodological drive, his interpretation and commentaries on Confucian Classics become unique and stylistic in comparison with his contemporaries. In general, his interpretation features in three ways: First, to reframe the boundary of traditional Confucian Classics studies; Second, to provide his refreshed commentaries on Confucian Classics texts in a critical manner; Third, to interpret the Confucian Classics texts from the perspective of so-called “unity of opposites.” On the other hand, there are three fallacies found in his discussion: falsehood, misconception, and over-complexity. Admittedly, his interpretation is twofold: Qian still made a contribution in terms of the interpretation on Confucian Classics texts, which differentiates from the traditional annotations and commentaries, and also benefited the study of Confucian Classics as a whole. However, the cutting edge of Confucian Classics study as a discipline seems to be eliminated. To a certain extent, Confucian Classics texts appear to be just a tool for Qian to express his reading response and personal reflection.

참고자료

· 없음