1456년 河緯地遺券의 진위논쟁과 그 의미 (A Study on The Development of Authenticity Controversy on Ha Wiji (河緯地) Testament in 1456)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 역사실학회
· 수록지 정보 : 역사와 실학 / 39권 / 33 ~ 57페이지
· 저자명 : 김건우

초록

This paper describes the process of development of
authenticity controversy on Ha Wiji(河緯地) testament. Ha Wiji
testament is a document written by Ha Wiji and given to his
nephew just before he was executed by King Danjong
restoration event in 1456. The testament had not been known
more than 200 years after he died but became known when Ha
Dalhae(河達海), who claimed his being the offspring of Ha
Wi-ji, requested and received the position of authentic offspring
from Min Jinhu, the person in authority at that time, in 1705.
Timely, the court reinstated Ha wiji to the symbol of loyal
subject and made Ha Dalhae authentic offspring who offers
sacrifice.
The testament of Ha Wiji just listed goods, as mentioned in
it. However, it was taken not as mere goods list but as a will
written in metaphorical method because several influential
persons had wrote in their books as such.
On the other hand, there were many scholars and politicians
who doubted the authenticity of Ha Wiji testament and insisted
on it's being false. in particular, Park Gyusu and Ha Sicheol(河
始徹) did. Ha Sicheol, who lived in Gaeseong(開城), argued
strongly it's being forgery when he raised dispute on the family
origin of Ha Wiji with Andong Ha family.
The development of authenticity controversy revealed that
both sides' logics had become more fine as time goes by and
controversial situation had became more complex due to
realistic reasons.

영어초록

This paper describes the process of development of
authenticity controversy on Ha Wiji(河緯地) testament. Ha Wiji
testament is a document written by Ha Wiji and given to his
nephew just before he was executed by King Danjong
restoration event in 1456. The testament had not been known
more than 200 years after he died but became known when Ha
Dalhae(河達海), who claimed his being the offspring of Ha
Wi-ji, requested and received the position of authentic offspring
from Min Jinhu, the person in authority at that time, in 1705.
Timely, the court reinstated Ha wiji to the symbol of loyal
subject and made Ha Dalhae authentic offspring who offers
sacrifice.
The testament of Ha Wiji just listed goods, as mentioned in
it. However, it was taken not as mere goods list but as a will
written in metaphorical method because several influential
persons had wrote in their books as such.
On the other hand, there were many scholars and politicians
who doubted the authenticity of Ha Wiji testament and insisted
on it's being false. in particular, Park Gyusu and Ha Sicheol(河
始徹) did. Ha Sicheol, who lived in Gaeseong(開城), argued
strongly it's being forgery when he raised dispute on the family
origin of Ha Wiji with Andong Ha family.
The development of authenticity controversy revealed that
both sides' logics had become more fine as time goes by and
controversial situation had became more complex due to
realistic reasons.

참고자료

· 없음