정적스트레칭과 뒤통수밑근 이완기법이 넙다리뒤근 단축증후군이 있는 허리통증환자의 통증 및 넙다리뒤근 유연성에 미치는 즉시효과 비교 (Comparison of the Immediate Effects of the Static Stretching and Suboccipital Muscle Release on Pain and Hamstring Flexibility in Low Back Pain Patients with Short Hamstring Syndrome)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국리듬운동학회
· 수록지 정보 : 한국리듬운동학회지 / 10권 / 2호 / 25 ~ 34페이지
· 저자명 : 서한교, 김은혜, 최영준

초록

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the static stretching and suboccipital muscle release on finger to floor distance test(FFDT), straight leg raise test(SLRT) and pain in low back patients with short hamstring syndrome(SHS).
Fifty patients with SHS were randomly assigned to either static stretching group(n=25) or suboccipital muscle release group(n=25). The static stretching and suboccipital muscle release intervention were applied to the groups. For the outcome measures included the FFDT, SLRT for the flexibility hamstring and VAS for the pain. The evaluator was blindfolded.
There were significant interactions between time and group in the FFDT, SLRT and VAS. In within-group comparison, both group appeared to be significantly different for FFDT, SLRT and VAS between pre and post test(p<.05). Also, between-group comparison revealed that the VAS score significantly different at post-test between the groups(p<.05).
These findings suggest that application of the static stretching and suboccipital muscle release may be advantageous to immediate decrease low back pain and increase flexibility of the hamstring in low back pain patients with SHS. Furthermore, for back pain, the suboccipital muscle release group was found to be more effective than static stretching group.

영어초록

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the static stretching and suboccipital muscle release on finger to floor distance test(FFDT), straight leg raise test(SLRT) and pain in low back patients with short hamstring syndrome(SHS).
Fifty patients with SHS were randomly assigned to either static stretching group(n=25) or suboccipital muscle release group(n=25). The static stretching and suboccipital muscle release intervention were applied to the groups. For the outcome measures included the FFDT, SLRT for the flexibility hamstring and VAS for the pain. The evaluator was blindfolded.
There were significant interactions between time and group in the FFDT, SLRT and VAS. In within-group comparison, both group appeared to be significantly different for FFDT, SLRT and VAS between pre and post test(p<.05). Also, between-group comparison revealed that the VAS score significantly different at post-test between the groups(p<.05).
These findings suggest that application of the static stretching and suboccipital muscle release may be advantageous to immediate decrease low back pain and increase flexibility of the hamstring in low back pain patients with SHS. Furthermore, for back pain, the suboccipital muscle release group was found to be more effective than static stretching group.

참고자료

· 없음