불교에서 ‘고(苦)’의 정신분석적 이해: ‘사성제’를 중심으로 1 (Psychoanalytic Understanding of 'Dukkha' in Buddhism: Based on 'Four Noble Truths' Part 1)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국정신분석학회
· 수록지 정보 : 정신분석 / 32권 / 4호 / 117 ~ 126페이지
· 저자명 : 김형훈, 하지현

초록

Recently, there has been an increasing interest in Buddhism in the field of psychiatry. Four Noble Truths is a primitive Buddhist teaching that deals with human suffering. Four Noble Truths relate to suffering, the cause of suffering, the cessation of suffering, and how to extinguish suffering. Suffering is called Dukkha in the old indian language. Authors analyzed the similarities and differences between Buddhism and psychoanalysis focused on ‘suffering’. Four Noble Truths can be interpreted psychoanalytically in terms of cure for human suffering. First Noble Truth is a declaration that life is suffering. While Buddhism emphasizes the impermanence and selflessness in understanding suffering, psychoanalysis understands suffering as a developmental task and individual conflict based on previous experiences. In addition, while psychoanalysis pursues a healthy self, Buddhism rejects all conceptualization of the self and places importance on the selflessness. In conclusion, Buddhism and psychoanalysis have a common point of dealing with human suffering, but there is a difference between the treatment methods and the ultimate goals.

영어초록

Recently, there has been an increasing interest in Buddhism in the field of psychiatry. Four Noble Truths is a primitive Buddhist teaching that deals with human suffering. Four Noble Truths relate to suffering, the cause of suffering, the cessation of suffering, and how to extinguish suffering. Suffering is called Dukkha in the old indian language. Authors analyzed the similarities and differences between Buddhism and psychoanalysis focused on ‘suffering’. Four Noble Truths can be interpreted psychoanalytically in terms of cure for human suffering. First Noble Truth is a declaration that life is suffering. While Buddhism emphasizes the impermanence and selflessness in understanding suffering, psychoanalysis understands suffering as a developmental task and individual conflict based on previous experiences. In addition, while psychoanalysis pursues a healthy self, Buddhism rejects all conceptualization of the self and places importance on the selflessness. In conclusion, Buddhism and psychoanalysis have a common point of dealing with human suffering, but there is a difference between the treatment methods and the ultimate goals.

참고자료

· 없음