사건, 사유 그리고 웃음의 함수 관계 - Friday를 중심으로 (The Functional Relation of Event, Thought and Smile - in the study of Friday)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 한국비교문학회
· 수록지 정보 : 비교문학 / 52호 / 359 ~ 378페이지
· 저자명 : 정익순

초록

It was a disaster when Robinson was wrecked into the desert island. The island was a society where no civilization is existed by human beings. The processes that Robinson had lived was like the story of salvation or the new world where mankind can live happily but which just excites human's curiosity. With his knowledge he thought that there were no men which drew him into the problem of others. Something that happened on an island was the accident that conceptualized another one or conflicted this with that to know what was the problem. We know that the concept of the incident was not represented implicitly from the story. And we have already recognized that the story of Robinson Crusoe had the same incident but differently from Tournier's Friday.
In a sense Robinson had to change his situation regarding to the problem of being with Friday. But this is the theme where Robinson had another story line in an incomplete society. At last his life style and balance of living with Friday broke only to make his readers laugh. This thesis has a point to concentrate themes on Deleuze and Bergson's philosophical position. It is an effect because we know their expectation. But when the scene and the story were fit for the interest of them the incidents changed into the twisted story at the same time. There are many actions we can not cause them to understand the logical explanation. These are the creative instrumental tools someday somebody makes another story line in their novels.
In Deleuze's philosophy, there has always been regarded as a very delicate problem for all presuppositions. These presuppositions are as much subjective as objective. Here this thesis tries to know that how by objective presuppositions we can get understood the concepts explicitly presupposed by a given incident. According to this hypothesis we understand that the true philosophical difference is in-itself already repetition between the relation of Robinson and Friday in Friday. Again the event is not what occurs an accident. It is rather inside what occurs as an incident purely expressed in a relation. Event gives us signal and awaits us. Event is that we must understand what happened in it. And the actor represents, but what he represents is always in the future and already in the past, whereas his representation is impassible and divided, unfolded without being ruptured, neither acting nor being acted upon. Anyway Friday actualizes the event, but in a way which is entirely different from the actualization of the event with the functional relation.

영어초록

It was a disaster when Robinson was wrecked into the desert island. The island was a society where no civilization is existed by human beings. The processes that Robinson had lived was like the story of salvation or the new world where mankind can live happily but which just excites human's curiosity. With his knowledge he thought that there were no men which drew him into the problem of others. Something that happened on an island was the accident that conceptualized another one or conflicted this with that to know what was the problem. We know that the concept of the incident was not represented implicitly from the story. And we have already recognized that the story of Robinson Crusoe had the same incident but differently from Tournier's Friday.
In a sense Robinson had to change his situation regarding to the problem of being with Friday. But this is the theme where Robinson had another story line in an incomplete society. At last his life style and balance of living with Friday broke only to make his readers laugh. This thesis has a point to concentrate themes on Deleuze and Bergson's philosophical position. It is an effect because we know their expectation. But when the scene and the story were fit for the interest of them the incidents changed into the twisted story at the same time. There are many actions we can not cause them to understand the logical explanation. These are the creative instrumental tools someday somebody makes another story line in their novels.
In Deleuze's philosophy, there has always been regarded as a very delicate problem for all presuppositions. These presuppositions are as much subjective as objective. Here this thesis tries to know that how by objective presuppositions we can get understood the concepts explicitly presupposed by a given incident. According to this hypothesis we understand that the true philosophical difference is in-itself already repetition between the relation of Robinson and Friday in Friday. Again the event is not what occurs an accident. It is rather inside what occurs as an incident purely expressed in a relation. Event gives us signal and awaits us. Event is that we must understand what happened in it. And the actor represents, but what he represents is always in the future and already in the past, whereas his representation is impassible and divided, unfolded without being ruptured, neither acting nor being acted upon. Anyway Friday actualizes the event, but in a way which is entirely different from the actualization of the event with the functional relation.

참고자료

· 없음