중국 근대 대(對) 조선 서사 기록과 문학적 형상화 연구 - 황준헌(黃遵憲)ㆍ주가록(周家祿)ㆍ장건(張謇)의 중한관계 저작과 시문을 중심으로 (A study on Chinese modern epic records of Joseon Dynasty and its literary embodiment: focused on the literary works about the relationship between Korea and China written by HuangZunXianㆍZhouJiaLuㆍZha)

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 중국인문학회
· 수록지 정보 : 중국인문과학 / 64호 / 349 ~ 382페이지
· 저자명 : 정해리

초록

The paper analyses relationship between the Joseon Dynasty and Qing Dynasty during modern transition on 『朝鮮策略(ChaoXianCeLue)』ㆍ『奧簃朝鮮三種 (AoYiChaoXianSanZhong)』ㆍ『朝鮮善後六策(ChaoXianShanHouLiuCe)』 and poetry and prose which were written by HuangZunXian(1848-1905)ㆍZhouJiaLu(1846-1909)ㆍ ZhangJian(1853-1926). It considers these works located on the center of shaping new alternation in East Asia as vivid records.
The study, specifically, examines (1) Chinese policy of Joseon strategy (2) Search on process of forming modern discourse in East Asia (3) Analyse epic records of the Joseon Dynasty and poetry and prose on chinese recognition of Joseon and identify of forming modern history. And it takes view of macro-framework under form and process of modern discourse in East Asia.
Firstly, the paper is a comprehensive analysis of literary works on the relationship between Korea and China and poetry and prose such as 『朝鮮策略(ChaoXianCeLue)』 ㆍ『奧簃朝鮮三種(AoYiChaoXianSanZhong)』ㆍ『朝鮮善後六策(ChaoXianShanHouLiuCe), and then studies on how it changed and what was the changing process.
Secondly, it examines the process of forming modern discourse in East Asia, the recognition for intellectuals of Qing and Joseon Dynasty about a convulsion of East Asia situation, and the countermeasure against that situation.
Last but not least, HuangZunXian, ZhouJiaLu, and ZhangJian left more than a few poetry and prose which were the problems and destiny of the Joseon Dynasty as topic and interacted with writers of that period. The study focuses on their literary works to search the chinese intellectuals of Joseon recognition and identity of forming modern history.The Im-o Military Revolt(壬午軍亂) which plays important background in political and period about epic records of Joseon Dynasty and poetry and prose is not only a local problem at that time. It arose from transition between Joseon Dynasty and Qing Dynasty in traditional chinese world order system and western influence on East and emerging Japan. In addition, Qing Dynasty made the best use of Joseon Dynasty situation to defense Russia that moved southward. Thus, chinese policy of Joseon strategy focused on keeping traditional chinese world order system. And it caused international dispute with status of Joseon Dynasty.
On the other hand, literary works on the relationship between Korea and China which were written by HuangZunXian, ZhouJiaLu, and ZhangJian revealed chinese view on modern transition of the Joseon Dynasty with diversified recognition. It could be said that Joseon and Qing had the same identify of forming modern history in terms of the recognition that are traditional master-servant relationship between two countries, causes and solutions of Joseon Dynasty decline, key figures who were Heungseon Daewongun, Queen Min, Gojong and civil servants, writers, and strenuous efforts in the Joseon Dynasty.

영어초록

The paper analyses relationship between the Joseon Dynasty and Qing Dynasty during modern transition on 『朝鮮策略(ChaoXianCeLue)』ㆍ『奧簃朝鮮三種 (AoYiChaoXianSanZhong)』ㆍ『朝鮮善後六策(ChaoXianShanHouLiuCe)』 and poetry and prose which were written by HuangZunXian(1848-1905)ㆍZhouJiaLu(1846-1909)ㆍ ZhangJian(1853-1926). It considers these works located on the center of shaping new alternation in East Asia as vivid records.
The study, specifically, examines (1) Chinese policy of Joseon strategy (2) Search on process of forming modern discourse in East Asia (3) Analyse epic records of the Joseon Dynasty and poetry and prose on chinese recognition of Joseon and identify of forming modern history. And it takes view of macro-framework under form and process of modern discourse in East Asia.
Firstly, the paper is a comprehensive analysis of literary works on the relationship between Korea and China and poetry and prose such as 『朝鮮策略(ChaoXianCeLue)』 ㆍ『奧簃朝鮮三種(AoYiChaoXianSanZhong)』ㆍ『朝鮮善後六策(ChaoXianShanHouLiuCe), and then studies on how it changed and what was the changing process.
Secondly, it examines the process of forming modern discourse in East Asia, the recognition for intellectuals of Qing and Joseon Dynasty about a convulsion of East Asia situation, and the countermeasure against that situation.
Last but not least, HuangZunXian, ZhouJiaLu, and ZhangJian left more than a few poetry and prose which were the problems and destiny of the Joseon Dynasty as topic and interacted with writers of that period. The study focuses on their literary works to search the chinese intellectuals of Joseon recognition and identity of forming modern history.The Im-o Military Revolt(壬午軍亂) which plays important background in political and period about epic records of Joseon Dynasty and poetry and prose is not only a local problem at that time. It arose from transition between Joseon Dynasty and Qing Dynasty in traditional chinese world order system and western influence on East and emerging Japan. In addition, Qing Dynasty made the best use of Joseon Dynasty situation to defense Russia that moved southward. Thus, chinese policy of Joseon strategy focused on keeping traditional chinese world order system. And it caused international dispute with status of Joseon Dynasty.
On the other hand, literary works on the relationship between Korea and China which were written by HuangZunXian, ZhouJiaLu, and ZhangJian revealed chinese view on modern transition of the Joseon Dynasty with diversified recognition. It could be said that Joseon and Qing had the same identify of forming modern history in terms of the recognition that are traditional master-servant relationship between two countries, causes and solutions of Joseon Dynasty decline, key figures who were Heungseon Daewongun, Queen Min, Gojong and civil servants, writers, and strenuous efforts in the Joseon Dynasty.

참고자료

· 없음