이병헌(李炳憲)의 공자(孔子) 십익지설(十翼之說) 비판–강유위(康有爲)의 『신학위경고(新學僞經考)』의 영향을 중심으로 (A Study on Yi Byeongheon(李炳憲)’s Criticism of Confucius’s Shi yi(十翼) – Focusing on Influence of Kang You-Wei(康有爲)’s Xin xue wei jing kao(新學僞經考))

서지정보

· 발행기관 : 서울대학교 종교문제연구소
· 수록지 정보 : 종교와 문화 / 34호 / 1 ~ 32페이지
· 저자명 : 임재규

초록

Confucius‘s Shi yi(十翼) has been accepted as a traditional orthodoxy of Confucianism for about 2,000 years after Liu xin(劉歆)’s Qi lüe(七略). However, due to the influences of the Song’s school of suspecting the ancient (疑古學), the Qing’s Textual Criticism(考證學) and School of Gongyang(公羊), Confucius‘s Shi yi(十翼) was criticized by many scholars. In this context, Yi Byeongheon, who lived in the late 19th century and the early 20th century, seems to have attempted a reasonable check on the author of Shi yi(十翼). And the purpose of a reasonable check on the author of Shi yi(十翼) is to upgrade Tuan(彖)·Xiang(象)·Wen Yan(文言)·the front part of Shuo Gua(説卦) created by Confucius to the position of The Scripture. Especially, in the point that the core idea of Confucian Religion Movement by Yi Byeongheon(李炳憲) is the way of god(神道) theory in Tuan(彖), the author of Tuan(彖) must be Confucius, and Tuan(彖) also must be the position of The Scripture.
Yi Byeongheon's criticism of Confucius’s Shi yi(十翼) can be regarded as basically influenced by Xin xue wei jing kao(新學僞經考) of Kang You-Wei(康有爲), a scholar of JinWenXue(今文學) in late Qing Dynasty. Of course, Yi Byeongheon did not accept the point of view of Kang You-Wei(康有爲) uncritically. It is Yi Byeongheon's unique viewpoint that the front part of Shuo Gua(説卦), that is from ‘昔者聖人之作易’ to ‘成言乎艮’ is the work of Confucius.

영어초록

Confucius‘s Shi yi(十翼) has been accepted as a traditional orthodoxy of Confucianism for about 2,000 years after Liu xin(劉歆)’s Qi lüe(七略). However, due to the influences of the Song’s school of suspecting the ancient (疑古學), the Qing’s Textual Criticism(考證學) and School of Gongyang(公羊), Confucius‘s Shi yi(十翼) was criticized by many scholars. In this context, Yi Byeongheon, who lived in the late 19th century and the early 20th century, seems to have attempted a reasonable check on the author of Shi yi(十翼). And the purpose of a reasonable check on the author of Shi yi(十翼) is to upgrade Tuan(彖)·Xiang(象)·Wen Yan(文言)·the front part of Shuo Gua(説卦) created by Confucius to the position of The Scripture. Especially, in the point that the core idea of Confucian Religion Movement by Yi Byeongheon(李炳憲) is the way of god(神道) theory in Tuan(彖), the author of Tuan(彖) must be Confucius, and Tuan(彖) also must be the position of The Scripture.
Yi Byeongheon's criticism of Confucius’s Shi yi(十翼) can be regarded as basically influenced by Xin xue wei jing kao(新學僞經考) of Kang You-Wei(康有爲), a scholar of JinWenXue(今文學) in late Qing Dynasty. Of course, Yi Byeongheon did not accept the point of view of Kang You-Wei(康有爲) uncritically. It is Yi Byeongheon's unique viewpoint that the front part of Shuo Gua(説卦), that is from ‘昔者聖人之作易’ to ‘成言乎艮’ is the work of Confucius.

참고자료

· 없음